Meta‐Analyses of Clinical Efficacy of Risankizumab and Adalimumab in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Supporting Evidence of Risankizumab Superiority. Issue 2 (8th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Witjes, Han; Khatri, Amit; Diderichsen, Paul M.; Mandema, Jaap; Othman, Ahmed A.
• Is Part Of: Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 107:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 435
• Page End: 442
• Publication Date: 2019-11-08
• Subjects: Pharmacology -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 615.5
• DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1624
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9236

Abstract

Abstract : Risankizumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, achieved significantly ( P < 0.001) greater Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) clear or almost clear (0/1) responses than adalimumab in a phase III trial in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Meta‐analyses of the PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and sPGA0/1 responses after 16 weeks of treatment from eight (three for risankizumab and five for adalimumab) randomized, placebo‐controlled trials were conducted to estimate the efficacy difference between risankizumab and adalimumab. For PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and sPGA0/1 responses, the estimated effect differences (95% confidence interval) between risankizumab and adalimumab were 15.2% (10.1%, 20.4%), 23.7% (15.7%, 31.2%), 20.8% (13.0%, 28.7%), and 20.1% (13.7%, 26.1%), respectively. These results were consistent with the observed efficacy difference from the head‐to‐head phase III trial, which was not included in the meta‐analyses, providing independent, confirmatory evidence of the superior efficacy of risankizumab compared with adalimumab for treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.