Biowaste treatment with black soldier fly larvae: Increasing performance through the formulation of biowastes based on protein and carbohydrates. (1st February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gold, Moritz; Cassar, Cecille Marie; Zurbrügg, Christian; Kreuzer, Michael; Boulos, Samy; Diener, Stefan; Mathys, Alexander
• Is Part Of: Waste management. Volume 102(2020)
• Page Start: 319
• Page End: 329
• Publication Date: 2020-02-01
• Subjects: Biological -- Treatment -- Waste -- Conversion -- Formulation -- Hermetia illucens; Hazardous wastes -- Periodicals; Refuse and refuse disposal -- Periodicals; 363.728
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-053X

Abstract

Highlights: Formulations similar in protein and non-fibre carbohydrate (NFC) contents were tested. Estimating biowaste NFCs by difference from the other macronutrients is not accurate. Reducing the variability of biowaste nutrients improved BSFL treatment performance. Waste reduction variability was more reduced than bioconversion rate. Lipids and fibres could further reduce performance variability. Abstract: A key challenge for black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) treatment is its variable reliability and efficiency when applied to different biowastes. Similar to other biowaste treatment technologies, co-conversion could compensate for variability in the composition of biowastes. Using detailed nutrient analyses, this study assessed whether mixing biowastes to similar protein and non-fibre carbohydrate (NFC) contents increased the performance and reduced the variability of BSFL treatment in comparison to the treatment of individual wastes. The biowastes examined were mill by-products, human faeces, poultry slaughterhouse waste, cow manure, and canteen waste. Biowaste formulations had a protein-to-NFC ratio of 1:1, a protein content of 14–19%, and a NFC content of 13–15% (dry mass). Performance parameters that were assessed included survival and bioconversion rate, waste reduction, and waste conversion and protein conversion efficiency. In comparison to poultry feed (benchmark), vegetable canteen waste showed the best performance and cow manure performed worst. Formulations showed significantly improved performance and lower variability in comparison to the individual wastes. However, variability in performance was higher than expected for the formulations. One reason for this variability could be different fibre and lipid contents, which correlated with the performance results of the formulations. Overall, this research provides baseline knowledge and guidance on how BSFL treatment facilities may systematically operate using biowastes of varying types and compositions.