934PCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). (1st October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 934PCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). (1st October 2019)
- Main Title:
- 934PCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
- Authors:
- Lavoie, J-M
Vandekerkhove, G
Annala, M
Taavitsainen, S
Sundahl, N L
Walz, S
Sano, T
Khalaf, D
Todenhöfer, T
Ost, P
Kollmannsberger, C K
Chi, K N
Black, P C
Wyatt, A W
Eigl, B J - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The therapeutic landscape for mUC is rapidly evolving, with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and targeted therapies providing new options. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to facilitate clinical decision-making. In this setting, ctDNA is a non-invasive method for genomic profiling, but its clinical utility remains largely untested. Methods: Whole blood samples were collected for next-generation sequencing of leukocyte and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Deep targeted sequencing was performed across a UC-specific custom 50-gene panel to a median unique read depth of 1040x for cfDNA. Clinical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics and outcomes. Results: From 12/2014 until 11/2018, 103 patients with mUC underwent blood collection for cfDNA analysis. Of these, 84 had detectable ctDNA. Baseline characteristics and outcomes are presented in the table below for the entire cohort, along with exploratory analyses for patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy or a CPI in the metastatic setting. For cases with ctDNA>1%, selected results based on the presence or absence of mutations (muts.) in TP53 and ERCC2, as well as tumour mutation burden (TMB), are included. Conclusions: In our mUC cohort, the presence of ctDNA fraction above median correlated with worse OS, while mutations in ERCC2 correlated with improved PFS for platinum-treated patients. These data support the further exploration and validation ofAbstract: Background: The therapeutic landscape for mUC is rapidly evolving, with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and targeted therapies providing new options. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to facilitate clinical decision-making. In this setting, ctDNA is a non-invasive method for genomic profiling, but its clinical utility remains largely untested. Methods: Whole blood samples were collected for next-generation sequencing of leukocyte and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Deep targeted sequencing was performed across a UC-specific custom 50-gene panel to a median unique read depth of 1040x for cfDNA. Clinical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics and outcomes. Results: From 12/2014 until 11/2018, 103 patients with mUC underwent blood collection for cfDNA analysis. Of these, 84 had detectable ctDNA. Baseline characteristics and outcomes are presented in the table below for the entire cohort, along with exploratory analyses for patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy or a CPI in the metastatic setting. For cases with ctDNA>1%, selected results based on the presence or absence of mutations (muts.) in TP53 and ERCC2, as well as tumour mutation burden (TMB), are included. Conclusions: In our mUC cohort, the presence of ctDNA fraction above median correlated with worse OS, while mutations in ERCC2 correlated with improved PFS for platinum-treated patients. These data support the further exploration and validation of ctDNA as a tool for biomarker development in mUC. Additional analyses will be presented for the entire 50-gene panel. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC). Disclosure: J. Lavoie: Honoraria (self): Astellas. N.L. Sundahl: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS. D. Khalaf: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. T. Todenhöfer: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. C.K. Kollmannsberger: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. K.N. Chi: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Essa; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tokai Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly/ImClone; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. B.J. Eigl: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Zomanex; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of oncology. Volume 30(2019)Supplement 5
- Journal:
- Annals of oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2019)Supplement 5
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0030-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-01
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
616.992 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/annonc/mdz249.033 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0923-7534
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1043.320000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12572.xml