Characterization of an aerosol generation system to assess inhalation risks of aerosolized nano-enabled consumer products. (24th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pearce, K.; Goldsmith, W.T.; Greenwald, R.; Yang, C.; Mainelis, G.; Wright, C.
• Is Part Of: Inhalation toxicology. Volume 31:Number 9/10(2019)
• Page Start: 357
• Page End: 367
• Publication Date: 2019-08-24
• Subjects: Aerosols -- exposure platform -- nano-enabled products -- metal oxide nanoparticles -- inhalation exposure; Pulmonary toxicology -- Animal models -- Periodicals; Pulmonary toxicology -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Health aspects -- Periodicals; 616.200471
• DOI: 10.1080/08958378.2019.1685613
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0895-8378

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The aerosolization of common nano-enabled consumer products such as cosmetics has significantly increased engineered nanoparticle inhalation risks. While several studies have investigated the impact of cosmetic dermal exposures, inhalation hazards of aerosolized cosmetics are much less known but could pose considerable harm to users due to potential co-exposure of nanoparticles and other product components. Materials and Methods: In this study, we developed a fully automated aerosol generation system to examine the aerosol properties of four aerosolized nano-enabled cosmetics using real-time monitoring and sampling instrumentation. Physicochemical characterization of aerosols was conducted using scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX). Characterization and calibration of animal exposure pods coupled to the system were also performed by measuring and comparing particle concentrations between pods. Results and Discussion: Results show peak emissions are shade dependent and varied between 12, 000–22, 000 particles/cm 3 with modal diameters ranging from 36 nm–1.3 µm. SEM-EDX analysis determined that the original products and collected aerosols have similar morphological features consisting of micron-sized particles decorated with nanoparticles and crystalline structures. Mean total particle concentration in pods at 5 and 10 mg/m 3 target levels were 2.22E + 05 #/cm 3 and 4.33E + 05 #/cm 3, respectively, with <10% variability between pods. Conclusions: The fully automated exposure platform described herein provides reproducible aerosol generation, conforms to recommended guidelines on chemical testing, and therefore is suitable for future in vivo toxicological assessments to examine potential respiratory hazards of aerosolized nano-enabled consumer products.