Forest loss shapes the landscape suitability of Kyasanur Forest disease in the biodiversity hotspots of the Western Ghats, India. (18th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walsh, Michael G; Mor, Siobhan M; Maity, Hindol; Hossain, Shah
• Is Part Of: International journal of epidemiology. Volume 48:Number 6(2019)
• Page Start: 1804
• Page End: 1814
• Publication Date: 2019-11-18
• Subjects: Kyasanur Forest disease -- landscape epidemiology -- deforestation -- zoonoses -- Western Ghats -- tick-borne disease; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz232
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5771

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Anthropogenic pressure in biodiversity hotspots is increasingly recognized as a major driver of the spillover and expansion of zoonotic disease. In the Western Ghats region of India, a devastating tick-borne zoonosis, Kyasanur Forest disease (KFD), has been expanding rapidly beyond its endemic range in recent decades. It has been suggested that anthropogenic pressure in the form of land use changes that lead to the loss of native forest may be directly contributing to the expanding range of KFD, but clear evidence has not yet established the association between forest loss and KFD risk. Methods: The current study sought to investigate the relationship between KFD landscape suitability and both forest loss and mammalian species richness, to inform its epidemiology and infection ecology. A total of 47 outbreaks of KFD between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2019 were modelled as an inhomogeneous Poisson process. Results: Both forest loss [relative risk (RR) = 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33–2.51] and mammalian species richness (RR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.16–1.42) were strongly associated with increased risk of KFD and dominated its landscape suitability. Conclusions: These results provide the first evidence of a clear association between increasing forest loss and risk for KFD. Moreover, the findings also highlight the importance of forest loss in areas of high biodiversity. Therefore, this evidence provides strong support for integrative approaches to public health which incorporate conservation strategies simultaneously protective of humans, animals and the environment.