Gaussian process models—II. Lessons for discrete inversion. Issue 3 (19th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Valentine, Andrew P; Sambridge, Malcolm
• Is Part Of: Geophysical journal international. Volume 220:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 1648
• Page End: 1656
• Publication Date: 2019-11-19
• Subjects: Inverse theory -- Probability distributions -- Statistical methods; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz521
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-540X

Abstract

SUMMARY: By starting from a general framework for probabilistic continuous inversion (developed in Part I) and introducing discrete basis functions, we obtain the well-known algorithms for probabilistic least-squares inversion set out by Tarantola & Valette. In doing so, we establish a direct equivalence between the spatial covariance function that must be specified in continuous inversion, and the combination of basis functions and prior covariance matrix that must be chosen for discretized inversion. We show that the common choice of Tikhonov regularization ($\mathbf {C_m^{-1}} = \sigma ^2\mathbf {I}$ ) arises from a delta-function spatial covariance, and that this lies behind many of the artefacts commonly associated with discretized inversion. We show that other choices of spatial covariance function can be used to generate regularization matrices yielding substantially better results, and permitting localization of features even if global basis functions are used. We are also able to offer a straightforward explanation for the spectral leakage problem identified by Trampert & Snieder.