Marginal bone loss one year after implantation: a systematic review of different loading protocols. Issue 1 (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sommer, M.; Zimmermann, J.; Grize, L.; Stübinger, S.
• Is Part Of: International journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. Volume 49:Issue 1(2020:Jan.)
• Page Start: 121
• Page End: 134
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: marginal bone loss -- dental implants -- loading protocol -- systematic review; Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry, Operative; Oral Surgical Procedures; Surgery, Oral; Dentistry; Maxilla -- Surgery; Mouth -- Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.52059
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.965
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0901-5027

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of different loading protocols on marginal bone loss (MBL). The outcomes of different implant loading protocols were assessed at 1 year after implantation, with focus on MBL; protocols included immediate, immediate non-occlusal, early, and conventional loading. The search strategy resulted in 889 studies. Twenty-two of these studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the included studies, the lowest MBL was for immediately loaded implants (0.05 ± 0.67 mm) and the highest for immediate non-occlusally loaded implants (1.37 ± 0.5 mm). The results of the meta-analysis showed an estimated mean MBL of 0.457 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.133–0.781) for immediate loading, 0.390 mm (95% CI 0.240–0.540) for immediate non-occlusal loading, 0.488 mm (95% CI 0.289–0.687) for early loading (>2 days to <3 months), and 0.852 mm (95% CI 0.429–1.275) for conventional loading (>3 months) implant protocols. The lowest decrease in 1-year implant survival per millimetre increase in MBL was observed for immediate loading and the highest for conventional loading. Conventional loading showed a significantly higher MBL than the other three loading protocols. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the immediate loading protocol is a reasonable alternative to the conventional loading protocol.