Effects of fermentative and non-fermentative additives on silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Pennisetum purpureum. (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effects of fermentative and non-fermentative additives on silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Pennisetum purpureum. (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Effects of fermentative and non-fermentative additives on silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Pennisetum purpureum
- Authors:
- Wu, Peiwen
Li, Lianhua
Jiang, Junfeng
Sun, Yongming
Yuan, Zhenhong
Feng, Xidan
Guo, Yufang - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: Mixed silage additive is more effective for improving high-moisture silage quality. Specific methane yield increased by 21.80–211.48% after ensilaging. The maximum specific methane yield was 334.69 ± 22.75 mL/g VS. The genera Enterobacter and Lactobacillus were the dominant desirable bacterial. NH3 -N, hemicellulose and lactic acid were positively correlated with the specific methane yield. Abstract: The effect of additives on the silage quality, microbial community, and anaerobic digestion performance of Pennisetum purpureum with high moisture content was studied. The sample treated with a mixed additive had best silage quality with the lowest pH and highest lactic acid/acetic acid ratio. Different additives influenced the dominant desirable bacteria. Correspondingly, Enterobacter was the dominant bacterial genus for sample with non-fermentative additives, whereas for the samples with fermentative or mixed additives, both Enterobacter and Lactobacillus had high relative abundance. The parameters of NH3 -N, hemicellulose and lactic acid were positively correlated with the specific methane yield, while the lignin content was inversely correlated with the specific methane yield. The higher specific methane yield of 293.81 ± 0.15–334.69 ± 22.75 mL/g VS was obtained for samples treated with fermentative additive. Therefore, the mixed additive and fermentative additive are recommended for the silage of material with high-moisture content to improveGraphical abstract: Highlights: Mixed silage additive is more effective for improving high-moisture silage quality. Specific methane yield increased by 21.80–211.48% after ensilaging. The maximum specific methane yield was 334.69 ± 22.75 mL/g VS. The genera Enterobacter and Lactobacillus were the dominant desirable bacterial. NH3 -N, hemicellulose and lactic acid were positively correlated with the specific methane yield. Abstract: The effect of additives on the silage quality, microbial community, and anaerobic digestion performance of Pennisetum purpureum with high moisture content was studied. The sample treated with a mixed additive had best silage quality with the lowest pH and highest lactic acid/acetic acid ratio. Different additives influenced the dominant desirable bacteria. Correspondingly, Enterobacter was the dominant bacterial genus for sample with non-fermentative additives, whereas for the samples with fermentative or mixed additives, both Enterobacter and Lactobacillus had high relative abundance. The parameters of NH3 -N, hemicellulose and lactic acid were positively correlated with the specific methane yield, while the lignin content was inversely correlated with the specific methane yield. The higher specific methane yield of 293.81 ± 0.15–334.69 ± 22.75 mL/g VS was obtained for samples treated with fermentative additive. Therefore, the mixed additive and fermentative additive are recommended for the silage of material with high-moisture content to improve the silage quality and methane yield. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Bioresource technology. Volume 297(2020)
- Journal:
- Bioresource technology
- Issue:
- Volume 297(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 297, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 297
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0297-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- Pennisetum purpureum -- Silage -- Additive -- Microbial community -- Anaerobic digestion
Biomass -- Periodicals
Biomass energy -- Periodicals
Bioremediation -- Periodicals
Agricultural wastes -- Periodicals
Factory and trade waste -- Periodicals
Organic wastes -- Periodicals
Bioénergie -- Périodiques
Déchets agricoles -- Périodiques
Déchets industriels -- Périodiques
Déchets organiques -- Périodiques
Déchets (Combustible) -- Périodiques
662.88 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09608524 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122425 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-8524
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2089.495000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12533.xml