Joint compensation of motion and partial volume effects by iterative deconvolution incorporating wavelet-based denoising in oncologic PET/CT imaging. (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rezaei, Sahar; Ghafarian, Pardis; Jha, Abhinav K.; Rahmim, Arman; Sarkar, Saeed; Ay, Mohammad Reza
• Is Part Of: Physica medica. Volume 68(2019)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 60
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: 18F-FDG PET/CT -- Reconstruction algorithm -- PSF -- TOF -- Combined compensation -- Respiratory motion -- Partial volume effect -- Quantification -- Lung cancer; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Physique -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.031
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-1797

Abstract

Highlights: The developed method to jointly compensate yielded improved PET quantification. Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising improved coefficient of variance. Higher contrast recovery and contrast-to-noise ratio were seen in compensated images. Abstract: Objectives: We aim to develop and rigorously evaluate an image-based deconvolution method to jointly compensate respiratory motion and partial volume effects (PVEs) for quantitative oncologic PET imaging, including studying the impact of various reconstruction algorithms on quantification performance. Procedures: An image-based deconvolution method that incorporated wavelet-based denoising within the Lucy-Richardson algorithm was implemented and assessed. The method was evaluated using phantom studies with signal-to-background ratios (SBR) of 4 and 8, and clinical data of 10 patients with 42 lung lesions ≤30 mm in diameter. In each study, PET images were reconstructed using four different algorithms: OSEM-basic, PSF, TOF, and TOFPSF. The performance was quantified using contrast recovery (CR), coefficient of variation (COV) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) metrics. Further, in each study, variabilities arising due to the four different reconstruction algorithms were assessed. Results: In phantom studies, incorporation of wavelet-based denoising improved COV in all cases. Processing images using proposed method yielded significantly higher CR and CNR particularly in small spheres, for all reconstruction algorithms and all SBRs ( P < 0.05). In patient studies, processing images using the proposed method yielded significantly higher CR and CNR ( P < 0.05). The choice of the reconstruction algorithm impacted quantification performance for changes in motion amplitude, tumor size and SBRs. Conclusions: Our results provide strong evidence that the proposed joint-compensation method can yield improved PET quantification. The choice of the reconstruction algorithm led to changes in quantitative accuracy, emphasizing the need to carefully select the right combination of reconstruction-image-based compensation methods.