Improved detection of CFTR variants by targeted next-generation sequencing in male infertility: a case series. Issue 6 (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smits, Roos M.; Oud, Manon S.; Vissers, Lisenka E.L.M.; Lugtenberg, Dorien; Braat, Didi D.M.; Fleischer, Kathrin; Ramos, Liliana; D'Hauwers, Kathleen W.M.
• Is Part Of: Reproductive biomedicine online. Volume 39:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 963
• Page End: 968
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: CBAVD -- CFTR variants -- Cystic fibrosis -- Male infertility -- Mutation panel -- Next-generation sequencing; Human reproductive technology -- Periodicals; Human embryo -- Periodicals; Reproduction -- Periodicals; 616.692
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.08.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1472-6483

Abstract

Abstract: Research question: Congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens (CBAVD) is characterized by 'obstructive azoospermia' in male patients with primary infertility. In the routine clinical workup of infertile men, patients with an absence of vas deferens are screened for CFTR variants. However, current genetic testing panels do not cover all variants, missing some CBAVD cases. Here, CFTR testing was explored by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to improve variant detection. Design: Five individuals with heterozygous pathogenic CFTR variants were identified using targeted NGS in a cohort of 1112 idiopathic infertile men with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. Pre-screening exclusion criteria were CBAVD by clinical examination with positive CFTR sequence analysis as part of routine fertility workup. Results: Cases 1, 2 and 3 presented with CBAVD after which CFTR screening by mutation panel analysis was negative. Case 4 presented with congenital unilateral absence of vas deferens, after which CFTR panel analysis identified a heterozygous p.(Phe508del) variant. Case 5 presented with a palpable vas deferens so CFTR panel analysis was not offered. In all five men, targeted NGS revealed additional pathogenic variants: p.(Arg117Cys) and p.(Arg1158*) (case 1); p.(Asp110His) and p.(Ser945Leu) (case 2); p.(Arg248Thr) and p.(Phe508Cys) (case 3); p.(Gly463Ser) (case 4); p.(Phe508del) (case 4 and 5); and p.(Arg117His) (case 5). Conclusions: Targeted NGS led to the detection of five infertile men with CFTR variants who would otherwise have remained undiagnosed after routine genetic screening during the fertility workup for azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. Given the wide availability of affordable targeted NGS, the data suggest that full gene analysis, and not mutation panels, should be considered to screen CFTR in azoospermic men.