Tree survival and growth responses in the aftermath of a strong earthquake. (21st July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Allen, Robert B.; MacKenzie, Darryl I.; Bellingham, Peter J.; Wiser, Susan K.; Arnst, Elise A.; Coomes, David A.; Hurst, Jennifer M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ecology. Volume 108:Number 1(2020:Jan.)
• Page Start: 107
• Page End: 121
• Publication Date: 2019-07-21
• Subjects: Distance decay -- disturbance -- Fuscospora -- landscape heterogeneity -- landslides -- mortality -- New Zealand -- Nothofagus; Plant ecology -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13238
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0477

Abstract

Abstract: The infrequent and unpredictable nature of earthquakes means that their landslide‐generated impacts on forests are rarely investigated. In montane forests, landslides are the main cause of tree death and injury during earthquakes. Landslides range from soil movements that uproot and bury trees over extensive areas to rock falls that strike individual trees. We examined unexplored relationships between tree survival and distance from an epicentre, soil‐available phosphorus (P) as an indicator of soil development and tree diameter. We expected decreased tree growth in damaged forests because of tree injury. We used a plot network, established in 1974 and resurveyed regularly ever since, to quantify survival and growth responses 6–30 km from the epicentre of a 1994 earthquake in New Zealand's Southern Alps. Our Bayesian analysis used 8, 518 trees from 250 plots that representatively sampled a naturally monospecific Nothofagus forest. As the time‐scales over which responses could emerge were unknown, we compared relationships for a pre‐earthquake period with 0–5 years post‐earthquake, and with 5+ years post‐earthquake. Not all plots were affected by the earthquake. We found that 0–5 years post‐earthquake survival increased logarithmically with distance from the epicentre with lowered survival up to 20 km from the epicentre. Survival was low on plots with high soil‐available P. An inverted U‐shaped relationship between survival and diameter pre‐earthquake was not found 0–5 years post‐earthquake. This was because of surprisingly high survival by large trees. The earthquake most often suppressed 0–5 years post‐earthquake growth up to 15 km from the epicentre, but this was only apparent after accounting for more general growth differences among periods. The positive relationship between growth and soil‐available P pre‐earthquake and 5+ years post‐earthquake reflected enhanced growth on young soils. This contrasted with a negative effect of soil‐available P on growth 0–5 years post‐earthquake. Synthesis. Soil‐available P, tree diameter and distance from the epicentre independently determined how tree survival and growth responded to an earthquake. The impacts on survival and growth largely occurred 0–5 years post‐earthquake and suggests a level of resilience in mountain beech forests. Abstract : Landslides near an earthquake's epicentre removed mountain beech forest over large areas and also caused smaller scale disturbance. Soil‐available P, tree diameter and distance from the epicentre determined tree survival and growth responses after the earthquake. The responses largely occurred within 5 years of the earthquake and suggest a level of resilience. Scree areas above tree line pre‐date the earthquake.