Protocol-driven multidetector SPECT/CT: integration of hybrid imaging into the routine workflow of whole-body bone scintigraphy in oncology patients. Issue 1 (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Protocol-driven multidetector SPECT/CT: integration of hybrid imaging into the routine workflow of whole-body bone scintigraphy in oncology patients. Issue 1 (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Protocol-driven multidetector SPECT/CT: integration of hybrid imaging into the routine workflow of whole-body bone scintigraphy in oncology patients
- Authors:
- Adusumilli, P.
Nejadhamzeeigilani, H.
Pitts, K.
McDermott, G.
Scarsbrook, A.F.
Vaidyanathan, S.
Patel, C.N.
Chowdhury, F.U. - Abstract:
- Abstract : AIM: To analyse the additional clinical value of protocol-driven and selective use of multidetector single-photon-emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in oncology patients undergoing whole-body bone scintigraphy (BS) and to analyse reporter confidence in diagnosis with and without SPECT/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, 2, 954 whole-body BS examinations were performed in oncology patients, with 444 (15%) undergoing additional protocol-driven SPECT/CT. Retrospective evaluation of planar BS and SPECT/CT images was performed by two experienced dual-trained nuclear medicine radiologists. The BS and SPECT/CT images were graded blindly using a five-point scale designed to evaluate the likelihood of a lesion being benign or malignant. Interpretation was applied on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: There was a 74.5% increase in definitive diagnostic classification and a 26.6% reduction in equivocal findings with SPECT/CT when compared to BS alone ( p <0001). Of cases initially classified as "probably benign" on BS, 5.1% (10/193) were reclassified to "probably malignant" (1%) or "malignant" (4.1%) using the SPECT/CT data. The highest impact in reporter confidence was seen with SPECT/CT in the interpretation of lesions within the pelvis (34%), ribs (23%), lumbar spine (22%), and thoracic spine (21%). CONCLUSION: Protocol-driven, selective use of SPECT/CT imaging to augment planar BS reduces equivocal findings and improves reporter confidenceAbstract : AIM: To analyse the additional clinical value of protocol-driven and selective use of multidetector single-photon-emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in oncology patients undergoing whole-body bone scintigraphy (BS) and to analyse reporter confidence in diagnosis with and without SPECT/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, 2, 954 whole-body BS examinations were performed in oncology patients, with 444 (15%) undergoing additional protocol-driven SPECT/CT. Retrospective evaluation of planar BS and SPECT/CT images was performed by two experienced dual-trained nuclear medicine radiologists. The BS and SPECT/CT images were graded blindly using a five-point scale designed to evaluate the likelihood of a lesion being benign or malignant. Interpretation was applied on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: There was a 74.5% increase in definitive diagnostic classification and a 26.6% reduction in equivocal findings with SPECT/CT when compared to BS alone ( p <0001). Of cases initially classified as "probably benign" on BS, 5.1% (10/193) were reclassified to "probably malignant" (1%) or "malignant" (4.1%) using the SPECT/CT data. The highest impact in reporter confidence was seen with SPECT/CT in the interpretation of lesions within the pelvis (34%), ribs (23%), lumbar spine (22%), and thoracic spine (21%). CONCLUSION: Protocol-driven, selective use of SPECT/CT imaging to augment planar BS reduces equivocal findings and improves reporter confidence whilst minimising the impact on patient and reporting workflows. Highlights: SPECT/CT in bone scintigraphy can be used selectively in a protocol-driven manner for oncology patients. SPECT/CT reduces equivocal findings compared to planar BS imaging. SPECT/CT significantly increases reporter confidence in the axial skeleton. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the impact of SPECT/CT on clinical management. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical radiology. Volume 75:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical radiology
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0075-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 79.e1
- Page End:
- 79.e7
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- Medical radiology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiology -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
Medical radiology
Radiotherapy
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00099260 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.128 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-9260
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.350000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12494.xml