Stakeholder trust and holistic fishery sustainability assessments. (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Stakeholder trust and holistic fishery sustainability assessments. (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Stakeholder trust and holistic fishery sustainability assessments
- Authors:
- Fleming, Aysha
Ogier, Emily
Hobday, Alistair J.
Thomas, Linda
Hartog, Jason R.
Haas, Bianca - Abstract:
- Abstract: Australia is considered world-leading in sustainable fisheries management. Despite this, public perceptions and trust in how fisheries are managed vary widely. Existing models of trust and community acceptance in extractive industries suggest transparently reporting on a wider range of sustainability issues than resource use and condition levels, or the status of target stocks in the case of fisheries, as a potential way to build public awareness and trust. Public perceptions of sustainability can be narrow or broad and related to different world views and perspectives about what is important. Here we investigate whether approaches such as Australia's conceptual 'Healthcheck' framework for fisheries sustainability reporting, could contribute to increasing public trust in fishery management. Interviews with 21 people who currently use (or would use) fisheries information in their professional work revealed interest in a wide range of sustainability issues and a desire for more easily accessible and trusted information. The interviews also revealed four common themes: Trust and distrust; Sustainability concerns and interpretations; Conflicts and values; and Fisheries information sources and knowledge gaps. These themes emphasise the need to take a broad view of sustainability and communication in fishery management, across the range of actors involved, to collaborate widely and build more engagement and relationships with the public in different forms. We use theseAbstract: Australia is considered world-leading in sustainable fisheries management. Despite this, public perceptions and trust in how fisheries are managed vary widely. Existing models of trust and community acceptance in extractive industries suggest transparently reporting on a wider range of sustainability issues than resource use and condition levels, or the status of target stocks in the case of fisheries, as a potential way to build public awareness and trust. Public perceptions of sustainability can be narrow or broad and related to different world views and perspectives about what is important. Here we investigate whether approaches such as Australia's conceptual 'Healthcheck' framework for fisheries sustainability reporting, could contribute to increasing public trust in fishery management. Interviews with 21 people who currently use (or would use) fisheries information in their professional work revealed interest in a wide range of sustainability issues and a desire for more easily accessible and trusted information. The interviews also revealed four common themes: Trust and distrust; Sustainability concerns and interpretations; Conflicts and values; and Fisheries information sources and knowledge gaps. These themes emphasise the need to take a broad view of sustainability and communication in fishery management, across the range of actors involved, to collaborate widely and build more engagement and relationships with the public in different forms. We use these findings to propose how the established model of trust and community acceptance of natural resource-based sectors could be applied to commercial fisheries and relate to other initiatives, such as the Sustainable Development Goals. Highlights: Building trust through transparency is increasingly important for commercial fisheries to operate. Interviews found that 'sustainability' is multi-dimensional for many stakeholders. A broader view of how to assess sustainability introduces areas of performance beyond those managed by fisheries agencies. Reporting on sustainability across a more holistic set of performance areas could increase trust in commercial fisheries. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Marine policy. Volume 111(2020)
- Journal:
- Marine policy
- Issue:
- Volume 111(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 111, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 111
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0111-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- Marine governance -- Sustainable development goals -- Social license -- Social indicators -- Community acceptance
Marine resources -- Economic aspects -- Periodicals
Fisheries -- Periodicals
Ressources marines -- Aspect économique -- Périodiques
Pêches -- Périodiques
Fisheries
Marine resources -- Economic aspects
Periodicals
333.916405 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0308597X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103719 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0308-597X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5377.250000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12501.xml