Analysis of Hospitalization after Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Implantation. Issue 5 (September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Zi; Abreu, Zita; Penner, Todd; He, Lian; Liu, Xihui; Bargman, Joanne M.
• Is Part Of: Peritoneal dialysis international. Volume 36:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 540
• Page End: 546
• Publication Date: 2016-09
• Subjects: Peritoneal dialysis -- peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion -- hospitalization; Peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; 617.461059
• DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00333
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0896-8608

Abstract

Background: Implantation of the peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC), usually an elective procedure, may necessitate unexpected hospitalization and even transfer to intensive care due to the multiple comorbidities and inherent instability of the end-stage renal disease patient. Information on hospitalization after PDC implantation is limited and details about the reason for hospitalization are lacking. Methods: We performed a cohort study in consecutive patients who underwent PDC implantation at a single institution from September 2007 to September 2013. Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients, technique of the implantation procedure, and all-cause unexpected hospitalization and morbidity within 14 days after implantation were analyzed. Results: Excluding the patients with pre-arranged admission, a total of 246 patients receiving 252 PDC implantations during the 6 years were studied. After 39 procedures (15.5%), patients had an unexpected hospital stay or re-admission due to operative complications (33.3%), worsening of disease (35.9%), or a single-night hospital stay for observation (30.8%). Compared with discharged patients, the patients with unexpected hospitalization were older ( p = 0.001), experienced higher rates of previous episodes of heart failure ( p = 0.006) and heart disease ( p < 0.001), had more use of general anesthesia (GA) ( p = 0.046), underwent more added procedures during the implantation ( p = 0.02), and had more episodes of flow obstruction and peritonitis after implantation ( p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). Using a multivariable logistic regression, we showed that age, cardiac morbidity, use of general anesthesia, PDC flow problems and peritonitis after implantation were independent predictors of all-cause unexpected hospitalization. Conclusions: For the first time, our study analyzed the predictors of unplanned hospitalization after PDC implantation and identified the salient risk factors. Increased focus to identify patients at greatest risk for hospitalization, evaluation of processes of care, and implementation of preventive strategies may be helpful to reduce unplanned hospitalization after catheter insertion.