Survival Analysis and Associated Factors in THAI Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis under the PD-First Policy. Issue 3 (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Changsirikulchai, Siribha; Sriprach, Suwannee; Thokanit, Nintita Sripaiboonkij; Janma, Jirayut; Chuengsaman, Piyatida; Sirivongs, Dhavee
• Is Part Of: Peritoneal dialysis international. Volume 38:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 172
• Page End: 178
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Chronic kidney disease -- end-stage renal disease -- epidemiology and outcome; Peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; 617.461059
• DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00127
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0896-8608

Abstract

Background: The peritoneal dialysis First (PD-First) policy means that PD is the first modality of dialysis chosen for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), as put forth by the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) scheme. It was initiated in Thailand in 2008. Our aim is to analyze patient survival, technique survival, and associated factors. Methods: Data of PD patients from January 2008 to November 2016 were studied. We calculated patient and technique survival rates (censored for death and kidney transplantation). Factors associated with survival were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Patient and technique survival rates between 2008 – 2012 and 2013 – 2016 were compared. Results: Our study included 11, 477 patients. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at initiation of PD was 54.0 (14.4) years. The level of education in 85.2% of cases was illiterate or primary school. A total of 60.9% of patients developed ESRD secondary to diabetes. The 1- to 5-year patient survival rates were 82.6, 71.8, 64.0, 58.5, and 54.0%, respectively. The first-year technique survival rate was 94.8%. The patient and technique survival rates during 2013 – 2016 were better than those seen during 2008 – 2012. Factors associated with lower patient survival rates were: female gender, increased age at start of PD, coverage with civil servant medical benefit scheme, low educational levels, and a history of diabetes. Conclusion: Most patients had diabetes and low educational levels as seen in the outcomes in the previous literature. These factors impacted the survival of patients under the PD-First policy.