Worldwide Experiences with Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis. Issue 5 (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Giuliani, Anna; Karopadi, Akash Nayak; Prieto-Velasco, Mario; Manani, Sabrina Milan; Crepaldi, Carlo; Ronco, Claudio
• Is Part Of: Peritoneal dialysis international. Volume 37:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 503
• Page End: 508
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: Peritoneal dialysis -- renal replacement therapies -- elderly -- caregiver; Peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; 617.461059
• DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00214
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0896-8608

Abstract

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is common in the elderly population, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) is often required. However, in this particular subgroup of patients, the choice between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often not an easy decision to make. Published literature has adequately demonstrated that PD prevalence is significantly less than HD across all patient age groups despite several advantages. We also know that elderly patients are less likely to complete a PD assessment, due to both medical and social barriers. Additionally, elderly patients are often reluctant to go ahead with PD despite being eligible PD candidates, mainly due to the fear of performing self-therapy. Recently, many new assisted PD (asPD) programs have cropped up in several countries. The main aim of these programs is to overcome barriers to PD and to promote PD utilization among elderly and non-self-sufficient patients. Although asPD has proven to be associated with good clinical results, there still remain concerns about its greater use. In this review, we will first describe an ideal asPD model and then enumerate examples of strategies and outcomes associated with successful asPD programs worldwide.