Mometasone absorption in cultured airway epithelium. Issue 12 (21st October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nguyen, Tuong T.; Soma, Paul S.; Mascenik, Teresa; Lewis, Catherine A.; Lee, Rhianna E.; Thorp, Brian D.; Zanation, Adam M.; Ebert, Charles S.; Senior, Brent A.; Randell, Scott H.; Ehrmann, Brandie M.; Kimple, Adam J.
• Is Part Of: International forum of allergy & rhinology. Volume 9:Issue 12(2019:Dec.)
• Page Start: 1451
• Page End: 1455
• Publication Date: 2019-10-21
• Subjects: intranasal corticosteroids -- steroid rinses -- allergic rhinitis -- nasal irrigations; 617.51005
• DOI: 10.1002/alr.22441
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2042-6976

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Topical mometasone is frequently used as an intranasal spray, on drug‐eluting stents, and compounded by specialty pharmacies as a sinus rinse. A typical sinus rinse contains 1.2 mg of mometasone dissolved in 240 mL of buffered saline and is flushed through the sinonasal cavity. The mometasone irrigation rapidly flows to the contralateral sinonasal cavity or the nasopharynx with a contact time on the order of 5 to 10 seconds. However, no information is available on the absorption rate of topical mometasone on the sinonasal surface. Methods: To determine the absorption characteristics of mometasone, we harvested nasal epithelium from 2 healthy donors and differentiated them into a mature ciliated epithelium on Millicell membranes. We applied mometasone to the apical surface for various time intervals and then rinsed off non‐absorbed mometasone with phosphate‐buffered saline. Millicell membranes with the adherent epithelial cells were then harvested and stored in guanidine hydrochloride for quantification using high‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Results: Fifty percent of the maximal absorption occurred after an average of 38 minutes after application, and maximal absorption occurred after an average of 114 minutes. Conclusion: Our data provide an estimate for rates of absorption of mometasone applied to the sinonasal cavity and suggest that the absorption rates poorly match contact time during saline lavage.