A mid-treatment break and reassessment maintains tumor control and reduces toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. (December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A mid-treatment break and reassessment maintains tumor control and reduces toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. (December 2019)
- Main Title:
- A mid-treatment break and reassessment maintains tumor control and reduces toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy
- Authors:
- Jackson, W.C.
Suresh, K.
Maurino, C.
Feng, M.
Cuneo, K.C.
Ten Haken, R.K.
Lawrence, T.S.
Schipper, M.J.
Owen, D. - Abstract:
- Highlights: A 1-month mid-treatment break with reduces the risk of treatment related toxicity. Incorporating a 1-month mid-treatment break did not compromise local control. Adapting permits high local control rates while decreasing the risk of toxicity. Abstract: Background and purpose: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) commonly have underlying liver dysfunction with variable tolerance to liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We hypothesized that insertion of a 1-month mid-treatment break would allow us to adapt treatment to the individual patient response, thereby reducing toxicity without compromising local control (LC). Materials and methods: We analyzed HCC patients receiving 3–5 fraction SBRT at our institution from 2005 to 2017. Over this time, patients were offered enrollment on prospective trials assessing individualized adaptive SBRT. Based on normal tissue complication probability and modeling of changes in liver function following a 1-month treatment break between fractions 3 and 4, patients could receive a total of 3 or 5 fractions. Patients not on trial received 3 or 5 fractions without a break. Toxicity was defined as a ≥2 point rise in Child–Pugh (CP) score within 6 months of SBRT. Results: 178 patients were treated with SBRT to 263 HCCs. Median follow-up was 23 months. 86 treatments had a 1-month break. 1-Year LC was 95.4%; this was not different between patients treated with or without a break ( p = 0.14). Controlling for tumor sizeHighlights: A 1-month mid-treatment break with reduces the risk of treatment related toxicity. Incorporating a 1-month mid-treatment break did not compromise local control. Adapting permits high local control rates while decreasing the risk of toxicity. Abstract: Background and purpose: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) commonly have underlying liver dysfunction with variable tolerance to liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We hypothesized that insertion of a 1-month mid-treatment break would allow us to adapt treatment to the individual patient response, thereby reducing toxicity without compromising local control (LC). Materials and methods: We analyzed HCC patients receiving 3–5 fraction SBRT at our institution from 2005 to 2017. Over this time, patients were offered enrollment on prospective trials assessing individualized adaptive SBRT. Based on normal tissue complication probability and modeling of changes in liver function following a 1-month treatment break between fractions 3 and 4, patients could receive a total of 3 or 5 fractions. Patients not on trial received 3 or 5 fractions without a break. Toxicity was defined as a ≥2 point rise in Child–Pugh (CP) score within 6 months of SBRT. Results: 178 patients were treated with SBRT to 263 HCCs. Median follow-up was 23 months. 86 treatments had a 1-month break. 1-Year LC was 95.4%; this was not different between patients treated with or without a break ( p = 0.14). Controlling for tumor size and dose a break was not associated with inferior LC (HR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.1–3.34, p = 0.54). 54 patients experienced a ≥2 point rise in CP score. Controlling for the number of prior liver directed therapies and mean liver dose, a treatment break reduced the odds of toxicity (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.17–1.03, p = 0.06). Conclusion: A one-month mid-treatment break and reassessment may reduce the odds of treatment related toxicity without compromising LC. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 141(2019)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 141(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 141, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 141
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0141-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 101
- Page End:
- 107
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12
- Subjects:
- Hepatocellular carcinoma -- Stereotactic body radiation therapy -- Local control -- Toxicity
Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.027 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12460.xml