Patient decision‐making in severe inflammatory bowel disease: the need for improved communication of treatment options and preferences. (29th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lai, C.; Sceats, L. A.; Qiu, W.; Park, K. T.; Morris, A. M.; Kin, C.
• Is Part Of: Colorectal disease. Volume 21:Number 12(2019)
• Page Start: 1406
• Page End: 1414
• Publication Date: 2019-07-29
• Subjects: biologic medications -- Crohn's disease -- ulcerative colitis -- colectomy; Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.34
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.14759
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8910

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and their physicians must navigate ever‐increasing options for treatment. The aim of this study was to elucidate the key drivers of treatment decision‐making in inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: We conducted qualitative semi‐structured in‐person interviews of 20 adult patients undergoing treatment for inflammatory bowel disease at an academic medical centre who either recently initiated biologic therapy or underwent an operation or surgical evaluation. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, iteratively coded, and discussed to consensus by five researchers. We used thematic analysis to explore factors influencing decision‐making. Results: Four major themes emerged as key drivers of treatment decision‐making: perceived clinical state and disease severity, the patient–physician relationship, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about treatment options, and social isolation and stigma. Patients described experiencing a clinical turning point as the impetus for proceeding with a previously undesired treatment such as infusion medication or surgery. Patients reported delays in care or diagnosis, inadequate communication with their physicians, and lack of control over their disease management. Patients often stated that they considered surgery to be the treatment of last resort, which further compounded the complexity of making treatment decisions. Conclusion: Patients described multiple barriers to making informed and collaborative decisions about treatment, especially when considering surgical options. Our study reveals a need for more comprehensive communication between the patient and their physician about the range of medical and surgical treatment options. We recommend a patient‐centred approach toward the decision‐making process that accounts for patient decision‐making preferences, causes of social stress, and clinical status.