Difference in Z scores of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio by mode of delivery. Issue 12 (15th September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Difference in Z scores of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio by mode of delivery. Issue 12 (15th September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Difference in Z scores of placental weight and fetal/placental weight ratio by mode of delivery
- Authors:
- Matsuda, Yoshio
Itoh, Toshiya
Okada, Eisaku
Sasaki, Kemal
Itoh, Hiroaki
Kanayama, Naohiro - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: The difference of placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z scores by mode of delivery is unclear. To investigate such differences and the actual conditions underlying the imbalance between fetal and placental growth. Methods: The data from Japanese database 2013 were assessed. Light‐for‐dates (LFD, n = 12 884), appropriate‐for‐dates ( n = 114 464) and heavy‐for‐dates ( n = 13 164) from 140 512 placentas/infants of mothers delivered a singleton infant. Using Z scores of PW and F/P based on the standard curves of a sex‐, parity‐ and gestational‐age‐specific PW and F/P, the rate of inappropriately heavy placenta according to the mode of delivery (vaginal [VD] vs cesarean [CS]) was investigated. Results: (i) The PW and F/P were heavier and bigger in VD than in CS, in each subgroup. In the LFD groups, the PW Z score in VD was higher than that in CS, whereas the F/P Z score was lower than in VD than that in CS. (ii) Data of single regression analyses between the PW Z score and F/P Z score in VD groups were different from those in CS, especially in LFD infants. (iii) In the LFD subgroups, the rates of inappropriately heavy placenta in VD ( n = 7781) and CS ( n = 5103) were 0.54% and 0.86%, respectively. Conclusion: Difference in the mode of delivery influenced the PW and F/P, and the rate of inappropriately heavy placenta is associated with mode of delivery among LFD infants. This methodology might give us a clue to search a useful way forAbstract: Aim: The difference of placental weight (PW) and fetal/placental weight ratio (F/P) Z scores by mode of delivery is unclear. To investigate such differences and the actual conditions underlying the imbalance between fetal and placental growth. Methods: The data from Japanese database 2013 were assessed. Light‐for‐dates (LFD, n = 12 884), appropriate‐for‐dates ( n = 114 464) and heavy‐for‐dates ( n = 13 164) from 140 512 placentas/infants of mothers delivered a singleton infant. Using Z scores of PW and F/P based on the standard curves of a sex‐, parity‐ and gestational‐age‐specific PW and F/P, the rate of inappropriately heavy placenta according to the mode of delivery (vaginal [VD] vs cesarean [CS]) was investigated. Results: (i) The PW and F/P were heavier and bigger in VD than in CS, in each subgroup. In the LFD groups, the PW Z score in VD was higher than that in CS, whereas the F/P Z score was lower than in VD than that in CS. (ii) Data of single regression analyses between the PW Z score and F/P Z score in VD groups were different from those in CS, especially in LFD infants. (iii) In the LFD subgroups, the rates of inappropriately heavy placenta in VD ( n = 7781) and CS ( n = 5103) were 0.54% and 0.86%, respectively. Conclusion: Difference in the mode of delivery influenced the PW and F/P, and the rate of inappropriately heavy placenta is associated with mode of delivery among LFD infants. This methodology might give us a clue to search a useful way for identifying the high‐risk groups requiring postnatal counseling. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. Volume 45:Issue 12(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
- Issue:
- Volume 45:Issue 12(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 12 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0045-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 2377
- Page End:
- 2385
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09-15
- Subjects:
- fetal/placental weight ratio -- light‐for‐dates infant -- mode of delivery -- placental weight -- Z score
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
618.1005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1447-0756 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=jog ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jog.14117 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1341-8076
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5026.055000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12440.xml