Converting forests into rubber plantations weakened the soil CH4 sink in tropical uplands. (29th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lang, Rong; Goldberg, Stefanie; Blagodatsky, Sergey; Piepho, Hans‐Peter; Harrison, Rhett D.; Xu, Jianchu; Cadisch, Georg
• Is Part Of: Land degradation & development. Volume 30:Number 18(2019)
• Page Start: 2311
• Page End: 2322
• Publication Date: 2019-08-29
• Subjects: deforestation -- land‐use change -- methane -- rubber plantation -- soil moisture -- soil texture -- tropics; Land degradation -- Periodicals; Soil conservation -- Periodicals; Reclamation of land -- Periodicals; Land use -- Periodicals; Economic development -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7315
• DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3417
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1085-3278

Abstract

Abstract: Large‐scale conversion of natural forest to rubber plantations has taken place for decades in Southeast Asia, help to make it a deforestation hot spot. Besides negative changes in biodiversity, ecosystem water, and carbon budgets, converting forests to plantations often reduced CH4 uptake by soils. The latter process, which might be partly responsible for resumed increase in the growth rate of CH4 atmospheric concentrations since 2006, has not been adequately investigated. We measured soil surface CH4 fluxes during 2014 and 2015 in natural forests and rubber plantations of different age and soil textures in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China—a representative area for this type of land‐use change. Natural forest soils were stronger CH4 sinks than rubber soils, with annual CH4 fluxes of −2.41 ± 0.28 and −1.01 ± 0.23 kg C ha −1 yr −1, respectively. Water‐filled pore space was the main factor explaining the differences between natural forests and rubber plantations, even reverting rubber soils temporarily from CH4 sink into a methane source during the rainy season in older plantations. Soil nitrate content was often lower under rubber plantations. Added as a model covariate, this factor improved explanation power of the CH4 flux—water‐filled pore space regression. Although soils under rubber plantation were more clayey than soils under natural forest, this was not the decisive factor driving higher soil moisture and lower CH4 uptake in rubber soils. Thus, the conversion of forests into rubber plantations exerts a negative impact on the CH4 balance in the tropics and likely contributes to global climate.