Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA. Issue 3 (9th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mächler, Elvira; Little, Chelsea J.; Wüthrich, Remo; Alther, Roman; Fronhofer, Emanuel A.; Gounand, Isabelle; Harvey, Eric; Hürlemann, Samuel; Walser, Jean‐Claude; Altermatt, Florian
• Is Part Of: Environmental DNA. Volume 1:Issue 3(2019:Sep.)
• Page Start: 290
• Page End: 301
• Publication Date: 2019-09-09
• Subjects: dendritic networks -- Ephemeroptera -- freshwater biodiversity -- metabarcoding -- Plecoptera -- Trichoptera; DNA -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Microbial ecology -- Periodicals; Biology; DNA; Microbial ecology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 572.86
• DOI: 10.1002/edn3.33
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2637-4943

Abstract

Abstract: Assessing individual components of biodiversity, such as local or regional taxon richness, and differences in community composition is a long‐standing challenge in ecology. It is especially relevant in spatially structured and diverse ecosystems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been suggested as a novel technique to detect taxa and therefore may allow to accurately measure biodiversity. However, we do not yet fully understand the comparability of eDNA‐based assessments to classical morphological approaches. We assessed may‐, stone‐, and caddisfly genera with two contemporary methods, namely eDNA sampling followed by molecular identification and kicknet sampling followed by morphological identification. We sampled 61 sites distributed over a large river network, allowing a comparison of various diversity measures from the catchment to site levels and providing insights into how these measures relate to network properties. We extended our data with historical morphological records of total diversity at the catchment level. At the catchment scale, identification based on eDNA and kicknet samples detected similar proportions of the overall and cumulative historically documented richness (gamma diversity), 42% and 46%, respectively. We detected a good overlap (62%) between genera identified from eDNA and kicknet samples at the regional scale. At the local scale, we found highly congruent values of local taxon richness (alpha diversity) between eDNA and kicknet samples. Richness of eDNA was positively related to discharge, a descriptor of network position, while kicknet was not. Beta diversity, a measure of dissimilarity between sites, was comparable for the two contemporary methods and is driven by species replacement and not by nestedness. Although eDNA approaches are still in their infancy and optimization regarding sampling design and laboratory work is still needed, our results indicate that it can capture different components of diversity, proving its potential utility as a new tool for large sampling campaigns across hitherto understudied complete river catchments. Abstract : Understanding the different components of biodiversity in spatially structured, complex ecosystems is a key tenant of ecology. We sampled may‐, stone‐, and caddisfly genera with contemporary eDNA and kicknet methods distributed over a large river network, allowing a comparison of various diversity measures from the catchment to site levels and providing insights into how these measures relate to network properties.