The diagnostic performance of dual energy CT for diagnosing gout: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. (14th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gamala, Mihaela; Jacobs, Johannes W G; van Laar, Jaap M
• Is Part Of: Rheumatology. Volume 58:Number 12(2019)
• Page Start: 2117
• Page End: 2121
• Publication Date: 2019-05-14
• Subjects: gout -- DECT -- review -- utility; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez180
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-0324

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to assess the utility of dual energy CT (DECT) for diagnosing gout. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies evaluating the utility of DECT for diagnosing gout were included. Reference standards were detection of monosodium urate crystals at SF assessment or a validated set of criteria. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 criteria. Data from person-based and joint-/localization-based evaluations were pooled separately, and subgroup analyses for disease stage/duration and reference standard were performed. Results: Ten studies were included; in person-based evaluations, the pooled (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (0.77, 0.86) and 0.91 (0.85, 0.95), respectively. In joint-based evaluations, they were 0.83 (0.79, 0.86) and 0.88 (0.83, 0.92), respectively. At short disease duration (⩽6 weeks), the pooled (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity at the joint level were 0.55 (0.46, 0.64) and 0.89 (0.84, 0.94), respectively. Conclusion: DECT has a high diagnostic accuracy in established gout, but its diagnostic sensitivity is low in subjects with recent onset gout.