Bomb or build? How party ideologies affect the balance of foreign aid and defence spending. (February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wenzelburger, Georg; Böller, Florian
• Is Part Of: British journal of politics and international relations. Volume 22:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 23
• Publication Date: 2020-02
• Subjects: defence spending -- foreign aid -- foreign policy -- party ideology; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1997-2007 -- Periodicals; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; Great Britain -- Foreign relations -- 1945- -- Periodicals; 320.094105
• DOI: 10.1177/1369148119883651
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-1481

Abstract

This article contributes to a growing literature that questions the traditional 'politics stops at the water's edge' paradigm. Left- and right-wing parties hold diverging ideologies and articulate specific party programmes regarding policy priorities in the realm of foreign and security affairs. The impact of partisan contestations over foreign policy priorities can be traced in defence and foreign aid spending. We understand this 'bomb-or-build'-balance as two sides of a coin which shapes the international posture of democracies. Our quantitative analysis of 21 OECD countries (1988–2014) reveals that the ideological positions of the parties in government influence the relative importance of military expenditures versus foreign aid. The more the ideological position of a government is tilted towards the military (and against internationalism), the more the 'bomb-or-build'-balance shifts in favour of military spending (and in disfavour of foreign aid).