Acute left main stem coronary occlusion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a patient without recognized coronary obstruction risk factors: a case report. Issue 4 (23rd October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Spina, Roberto; Khalique, Omar; George, Isaac; Nazif, Tamim
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 2:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 7
• Publication Date: 2018-10-23
• Subjects: TAVR -- TAVI -- Aortic stenosis -- Coronary obstruction -- Acute coronary occlusion -- Case report; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Case studies -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Case studies -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/yty112
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2514-2119

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Acute coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an uncommon but life-threatening event. Case summary: A 78-year-old man developed acute left main obstruction following transfemoral TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve. Cardiac arrest ensued, requiring emergent peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the left main coronary artery was performed with one drug-eluting stent. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) demonstrated focal underexpansion of the stent in its proximal segment which was not responsive to high-pressure non-compliant balloon dilatation, suggesting stent compression from either valve strut or calcific native leaflet. Therefore, to increase radial strength of the scaffolding at the site of compression, we deployed a second stent within the first stent, and further expanded that segment with high-pressure balloon inflations. Final IVUS demonstrated better expansion of the focally compressed segment. Following PCI, left ventricular function normalized completely. The patient was discharged from hospital on Day 3 post-procedure. At 12 weeks follow-up, his dyspnoea had improved significantly, and follow-up transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated normal left ventricular systolic function and normal aortic valve function. Discussion: Established risk factors for coronary ostial occlusion include a short distance between the aortic annulus and the coronary ostia (<10 mm) and a narrow aortic root (<28 mm at the sinuses of Valsalva). These two factors increase the likelihood that the native valve leaflets are displaced over and obstruct the coronary ostia when the aortic bioprosthesis is deployed. Perplexingly, our patient did not present with any of the recognized risk factors for acute coronary occlusion, suggesting other factors might be at play. We suggest that a leaflet length to coronary sinus height ratio greater than 1 might be an additional useful predictor of coronary occlusion during TAVR. In addition, we suggest that if residual focal stent compression from either valve strut or calcific leaflet exists after stent deployment and the latter is resistant to balloon dilatation, deploying a second concentric layer of stent might improve the radial strength of the scaffolding and improve overall stent expansion.