Choosing Air Strikes. Issue 2 (11th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Allen, Susan Hannah; Martinez Machain, Carla
• Is Part Of: Journal of global security studies. Volume 3:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 150
• Page End: 162
• Publication Date: 2018-04-11
• Subjects: air power -- coercion -- crisis escalation; Security, International -- Periodicals; International relations -- Periodicals; 327.1
• DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogy005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2057-3170

Abstract

Abstract: Under what conditions do states choose to use only air power? Air strikes are one of many tools states use to promote their interests in the international system. Given that not all policy tools are appropriate for all crises, we explore when states choose to use air strikes as a coercive tool. We empirically test both common perceptions and newly derived hypotheses on the characteristics of states that employ air-only campaigns and the settings in which they do so, using newly collected data on the uses of air power during international crises between 1908 and 2006. Looking at the events that trigger the crises and the salience of the issues at stake, alongside the characteristics of the states involved, provides a clearer picture of when states use air power versus other coercive tools. Our research indicates that air-only campaigns are more likely to be initiated by militarily powerful states, but that in higher stakes crises, states are more likely to use ground troops or ground and air forces in combination.