A general equilibrium analysis on the impacts of regional and sectoral emission allowance allocation at carbon trading market. (10th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yu, Zhongjue; Geng, Yong; Dai, Hancheng; Wu, Rui; Liu, Zhiqing; Tian, Xu; Bleischwitz, Raimund
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 192(2018)
• Page Start: 421
• Page End: 432
• Publication Date: 2018-08-10
• Subjects: Emission trading scheme -- Allowance allocation -- Computable general equilibrium model -- Urban governance -- Shanghai; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: It is critical to adapt to climate change and reduce the overall carbon emissions. China announced its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) at the Paris climate conference in 2015. The carbon cap-and-trade scheme, which plays a key role in carbon emissions abatement, is an effective policy for China to achieve its NDC. This study focuses on the allocation of regional and sectoral initial carbon emission allowances in Shanghai. An impact evaluation on the macro-economy, carbon trading markets and participating sectors for the year 2030 was conducted by applying a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The results show that the carbon cap-and-trade scheme would cause a 3.4% GDP loss and an 8.9% welfare loss in 2030. The carbon price would be 161.2 USD/t and 147.2 USD/t under the two representative scenarios. The allocation of initial allowances would have a significant impact on both carbon market scale and sectoral trading behaviors. The power generation sector and the petrol oil sector would undertake the greatest output loss, while the metal smelting sector would become the main seller. Furthermore, the initial allowances allocation under a certain abatement target would hardly affect sectoral production but remarkably affect trade behaviors at the carbon trading markets.