Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ‐based tube current modulation technique. Issue 11 (20th October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gandhi, Diksha; Crotty, Dominic J.; Stevens, Grant M.; Schmidt, Taly Gilat
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 42:Issue 11(2015)
• Page Start: 6572
• Page End: 6578
• Publication Date: 2015-10-20
• Subjects: biological organs -- biomedical equipment -- computerised tomography -- dosimetry -- Monte Carlo methods -- phantoms -- X‐ray tubes; Dosimetry/exposure assessment -- Computed tomography -- Computed radiography -- Monte Carlo simulations; Computerised tomographs -- Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers -- X‐ray tubes -- Devices sensitive to very short wavelength, e.g. x‐rays, gamma‐rays or corpuscular radiation -- Transforming x‐rays -- X‐ray technique -- Scintigraphy; CT -- dose -- tube current modulation -- Monte Carlo; Medical image noise -- Lungs -- Brain -- Tissues -- Dosimetry -- Heart -- Monte Carlo methods; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4933197
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This technical note quantifies the dose and image quality performance of a clinically available organ‐dose‐based tube current modulation (ODM) technique, using experimental and simulation phantom studies. The investigated ODM implementation reduces the tube current for the anterior source positions, without increasing current for posterior positions, although such an approach was also evaluated for comparison. Methods: Axial CT scans at 120 kV were performed on head and chest phantoms on an ODM‐equipped scanner (Optima CT660, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, England). Dosimeters quantified dose to breast, lung, heart, spine, eye lens, and brain regions for ODM and 3D‐modulation (SmartmA) settings. Monte Carlo simulations, validated with experimental data, were performed on 28 voxelized head phantoms and 10 chest phantoms to quantify organ dose and noise standard deviation. The dose and noise effects of increasing the posterior tube current were also investigated. Results: ODM reduced the dose for all experimental dosimeters with respect to SmartmA, with average dose reductions across dosimeters of 31% (breast), 21% (lung), 24% (heart), 6% (spine), 19% (eye lens), and 11% (brain), with similar results for the simulation validation study. In the phantom library study, the average dose reduction across all phantoms was 34% (breast), 20% (lung), 8% (spine), 20% (eye lens), and 8% (brain). ODM increased the noise standard deviation in reconstructed images by 6%–20%, with generally greater noise increases in anterior regions. Increasing the posterior tube current provided similar dose reduction as ODM for breast and eye lens, increased dose to the spine, with noise effects ranging from 2% noise reduction to 16% noise increase. At noise equal to SmartmA, ODM increased the estimated effective dose by 4% and 8% for chest and head scans, respectively. Increasing the posterior tube current further increased the effective dose by 15% (chest) and 18% (head) relative to SmartmA. Conclusions: ODM reduced dose in all experimental and simulation studies over a range of phantoms, while increasing noise. The results suggest a net dose/noise benefit for breast and eye lens for all studied phantoms, negligible lung dose effects for two phantoms, increased lung dose and/or noise for eight phantoms, and increased dose and/or noise for brain and spine for all studied phantoms compared to the reference protocol.