Analytical dose modeling for preclinical proton irradiation of millimetric targets. Issue 1 (15th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vanstalle, Marie; Constanzo, Julie; Karakaya, Yusuf; Finck, Christian; Rousseau, Marc; Brasse, David
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 45:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 470
• Page End: 478
• Publication Date: 2017-12-15
• Subjects: analytical dose modeling -- Geant4 -- millimetric target -- protontherapy -- small animal -- treatment planning; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.12696
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Due to the considerable development of proton radiotherapy, several proton platforms have emerged to irradiate small animals in order to study the biological effectiveness of proton radiation. A dedicated analytical treatment planning tool was developed in this study to accurately calculate the delivered dose given the specific constraints imposed by the small dimensions of the irradiated areas. Methods: The treatment planning system (TPS) developed in this study is based on an analytical formulation of the Bragg peak and uses experimental range values of protons. The method was validated after comparison with experimental data from the literature and then compared to Monte Carlo simulations conducted using Geant 4. Three examples of treatment planning, performed with phantoms made of water targets and bone‐slab insert, were generated with the analytical formulation and Geant 4. Each treatment planning was evaluated using dose‐volume histograms and gamma index maps. Results: We demonstrate the value of the analytical function for mouse irradiation, which requires a targeting accuracy of 0.1 mm. Using the appropriate database, the analytical modeling limits the errors caused by misestimating the stopping power. For example, 99% of a 1‐mm tumor irradiated with a 24‐MeV beam receives the prescribed dose. The analytical dose deviations from the prescribed dose remain within the dose tolerances stated by report 62 of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements for all tested configurations. In addition, the gamma index maps show that the highly constrained targeting accuracy of 0.1 mm for mouse irradiation leads to a significant disagreement between Geant 4 and the reference. This simulated treatment planning is nevertheless compatible with a targeting accuracy exceeding 0.2 mm, corresponding to rat and rabbit irradiations. Conclusion: Good dose accuracy for millimetric tumors is achieved with the analytical calculation used in this work. These volume sizes are typical in mouse models for radiation studies. Our results demonstrate that the choice of analytical rather than simulated treatment planning depends on the animal model under consideration.