'C'mon, No One Wants a Dick Pic': exploring the cultural framings of the 'Dick Pic' in contemporary online publics. Issue 1 (2nd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Waling, Andrea; Pym, Tinonee
• Is Part Of: Journal of gender studies. Volume 28:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 70
• Page End: 85
• Publication Date: 2019-01-02
• Subjects: Sexuality -- masculinity -- sexting -- digital media -- dick pics -- bodies; Feminism -- Periodicals; Women -- Periodicals; Gender identity -- Periodicals; Sex role -- Periodicals; Sexual orientation -- Periodicals; Féminisme -- Périodiques; Femmes -- Périodiques; Identité sexuelle -- Périodiques; Rôle selon le sexe -- Périodiques; Orientation sexuelle -- Périodiques; 305.3
• DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2017.1394821
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0958-9236

Abstract

Abstract: The 'dick pic' (DP) has become a growing cultural phenomenon in the digital realm, attracting increasing commentary regarding why men send them, with women's responses constituting online social movements. Emerging research concerning the practice of DPs has been incredibly limited, with discussion focused on youth sexting practices and online harassment more broadly. However, research focusing specifically on the gendered dynamics of heterosexual boys' and men's engagement with DPs is significantly absent, and there has been no attempt to explore how the DP is framed in public commentary. We draw from a qualitative content analysis of social media and digital news articles, comics and blogs discussing the 'dick pic', highlighting four major ways in which the 'dick pic' is framed. These include: assumptions regarding men's motivations, women's production of 'counterpublics' and feminist resistance to the DP, satirical and humourous responses to DPs, and positive and transformative responses involving the active solicitation of men's DPs. We argue that such responses work to interpret and address men's behaviours, but lack critical consideration regarding their underlying motives and the roles DPs might have in relation to their sexual subjectivities. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of such responses and calls for future research.