Blood Flow Lateralization and Collateral Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis. Issue 5 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zarrinkoob, Laleh; Wåhlin, Anders; Ambarki, Khalid; Birgander, Richard; Eklund, Anders; Malm, Jan
• Is Part Of: Stroke. Volume 50:Issue 5(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: carotid stenosis -- circle of Willis -- humans -- magnetic resonance imaging, cine -- middle cerebral artery; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cerebral circulation -- Periodicals; 616.81
• DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024757
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0039-2499

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Purpose—: Four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging enables quantification of blood flow rate (BFR; mL/min) in multiple cerebral arteries simultaneously, making it a promising technique for hemodynamic investigation in patients with stroke. The aim of this study was to quantify the hemodynamic disturbance and the compensatory pattern of collateral flow in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Methods—: Thirty-eight patients (mean, 72 years; 27 men) with symptomatic carotid stenosis (≥50%) or occlusion were investigated using 4-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. For each patient, BFR was measured in 19 arteries/locations. The ipsilateral side to the symptomatic carotid stenosis was compared with the contralateral side. Results—: Internal carotid artery BFR was lower on the ipsilateral side (134±87 versus 261±95 mL/min; P <0.001). BFR in anterior cerebral artery (A1 segment) was lower on ipsilateral side (35±58 versus 119±72 mL/min; P <0.001). Anterior cerebral artery territory bilaterally was primarily supplied by contralateral internal carotid artery. The ipsilateral internal carotid artery mainly supplied the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. MCA was also supplied by a reversed BFR found in the ophthalmic and the posterior communicating artery routes on the ipsilateral side (−5±28 versus 10±28 mL/min, P =0.001, and −2±12 versus 6±6 mL/min, P =0.03, respectively). Despite these compensations, BFR in MCA was lower on the ipsilateral side, and this laterality was more pronounced in patients with severe carotid stenosis (≥70%). Although comparing ipsilateral MCA BFR between stenosis groups (<70% and ≥70%), there was no difference ( P =0.95). Conclusions—: With a novel approach using 4-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging, we could simultaneously quantify and rank the importance of collateral routes in patients with carotid stenosis. An important observation was that contralateral internal carotid artery mainly secured the bilateral anterior cerebral artery territory. Because of the collateral recruitment, compromised BFR in MCA is not necessarily related to the degree of carotid stenosis. These findings highlight the importance of simultaneous investigation of the hemodynamics of the entire cerebral arterial tree.