Surgical Decision Making in Brain Hemorrhage: New Analysis of the STICH, STICH II, and STITCH(Trauma) Randomized Trials. Issue 5 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gregson, Barbara A.; Mitchell, Patrick; Mendelow, A. David
• Is Part Of: Stroke. Volume 50:Issue 5(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: cerebral hemorrhage -- conservative treatment -- decision making -- Glasgow Outcome Scale -- surgery; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cerebral circulation -- Periodicals; 616.81
• DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022694
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0039-2499

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Purpose—: The STICH (Surgical Trial in Lobar Intracerebral Haemorrhage) I and II trials randomized patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to early surgery or initial conservative treatment. Both were nonsignificant; possibly because surgery has minimal effect on recovery, or because surgery benefits some and harms others. We introduce a new nonparametric method of analysis. The method is then applied to data from a third trial, STITCH(Trauma) (Surgical Trial in Traumatic Intracerebral Haemorrhage), which addressed a similar surgical question in head-injured patients. Methods—: Data from 1541 patients from the STICH trials were analyzed using (1) standard meta-analysis of prognosis-based dichotomized outcome and prespecified standard subgroups of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 3–8, 9–12, and 13–15; (2) new nonparametric regression of ranked Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale against ranked GCS and ranked volume; and (3) analysis (1) repeated using categories identified by analysis (2). Results—: Standard meta-analysis showed more favorable outcomes, although nonsignificant, with surgery if presenting GCS was 9–12 (spontaneous ICH odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.48–1.03; P =0.07]; traumatic odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.18–1.26; P =0.14]). Ranked analysis showed a similar pattern of results for both spontaneous and traumatic ICH. Surgery was harmful for small lesions with increasing benefit for larger volumes. With GCS, surgery had little effect at either ends of the spectrum but suggested a beneficial effect in the range 10 to 13 (identified graphically). Repeating the meta-analysis with this categorization showed significant benefit for surgery (spontaneous odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.51–1.00; P =0.05]; traumatic odds ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.05–0.51; P =0.002]). Conclusions—: The nonsignificant results observed in the STICH trials are because of mixing patients who benefit from surgery with those who are harmed. Patients with a GCS 10–13 or a large ICH are likely to benefit from surgery. Our analysis showed a similar effect on traumatic ICH/contusion data and promises to be a valuable tool. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ . Unique identifiers: ISRCTN19976990 (STITCH), ISRCTN22153967 (STICH II), and ISRCTN19321911 (STITCH[Trauma]). Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.