Comparison of climate vulnerability among desert herpetofauna. (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Griffis-Kyle, Kerry L.; Mougey, Krista; Vanlandeghem, Matt; Swain, Sharmistha; Drake, Joseph C.
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 225(2018)
• Page Start: 164
• Page End: 175
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: CCVI Climate Change Vulnerability Index -- CMIP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project -- Herp Herpetofauna (e.g. reptiles and amphibians) -- IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature -- RCP Representative Concentration Pathways; Climate change -- Qualitative vulnerability -- Trait-based vulnerability -- Amphibians -- Reptiles -- Invasive species; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Abstract: Globally, biodiversity is declining, and a major driver of this decline is climate change; consequently, we need ways to evaluate the vulnerability of species to this change. We assessed 25 species of herpetofauna (7 amphibians and 18 reptiles) using multi-model averaging of NatureServe's Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI), a qualitative trait-based vulnerability assessment tool. We calculated vulnerability across model runs varying type and extent of spatial data and climate model scenario. Amphibians were more vulnerable than reptiles. The most vulnerable species were those that were dependent on water for their habitat, high elevation species, and habitat specialists. For reptiles in particular, the projected downscaled extent of temperature change and change in moisture availability were also important in delineating vulnerability. Unfortunately, the invasive American Bullfrog was less vulnerable than any of the native amphibians, which highlights the importance of considering invasives when planning for climate change. Snakes that were riparian specialists also were ranked as highly vulnerable. Lizards were ranked as less vulnerable related to projected differences in the proportion of their range experiencing larger changes in temperature. We suggest improvements to the CCVI vulnerability index. For example, certain aspects of reptile biology that are critical to climate-related vulnerability are not included in the current generation of the Climate Change Vulnerability Index, specifically reproductive strategy and the difference in vulnerability between viviparous and oviparous species. Methods for assessing vulnerability will need continued refinement as we contend with climate change and other human-caused factors that are driving the biodiversity crisis. Highlights: The most vulnerable species were dependent on water, habitat specialists, or exposed to greater changes in climate The invasive American Bullfrog was less vulnerable than any of the native amphibians which were very vulnerable Lizards were ranked as less vulnerable, despite evidence that climate-related declines are already occurring There is no place to include aspects of reptile biologycritical for assessing climate vulnerability in the current index