Analysis of aggregated cell–cell statistical distances within pathways unveils therapeutic-resistance mechanisms in circulating tumor cells. (11th June 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Analysis of aggregated cell–cell statistical distances within pathways unveils therapeutic-resistance mechanisms in circulating tumor cells. (11th June 2016)
- Main Title:
- Analysis of aggregated cell–cell statistical distances within pathways unveils therapeutic-resistance mechanisms in circulating tumor cells
- Authors:
- Schissler, A. Grant
Li, Qike
Chen, James L.
Kenost, Colleen
Achour, Ikbel
Billheimer, D. Dean
Li, Haiquan
Piegorsch, Walter W.
Lussier, Yves A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Motivation: As 'omics' biotechnologies accelerate the capability to contrast a myriad of molecular measurements from a single cell, they also exacerbate current analytical limitations for detecting meaningful single-cell dysregulations. Moreover, mRNA expression alone lacks functional interpretation, limiting opportunities for translation of single-cell transcriptomic insights to precision medicine. Lastly, most single-cell RNA-sequencing analytic approaches are not designed to investigate small populations of cells such as circulating tumor cells shed from solid tumors and isolated from patient blood samples. Results: In response to these characteristics and limitations in current single-cell RNA-sequencing methodology, we introduce an analytic framework that models transcriptome dynamics through the analysis of aggregated cell–cell statistical distances within biomolecular pathways. Cell–cell statistical distances are calculated from pathway mRNA fold changes between two cells. Within an elaborate case study of circulating tumor cells derived from prostate cancer patients, we develop analytic methods of aggregated distances to identify five differentially expressed pathways associated to therapeutic resistance. Our aggregation analyses perform comparably with Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and better than differentially expressed genes followed by gene set enrichment. However, these methods were not designed to inform on differential pathway expression for aAbstract : Motivation: As 'omics' biotechnologies accelerate the capability to contrast a myriad of molecular measurements from a single cell, they also exacerbate current analytical limitations for detecting meaningful single-cell dysregulations. Moreover, mRNA expression alone lacks functional interpretation, limiting opportunities for translation of single-cell transcriptomic insights to precision medicine. Lastly, most single-cell RNA-sequencing analytic approaches are not designed to investigate small populations of cells such as circulating tumor cells shed from solid tumors and isolated from patient blood samples. Results: In response to these characteristics and limitations in current single-cell RNA-sequencing methodology, we introduce an analytic framework that models transcriptome dynamics through the analysis of aggregated cell–cell statistical distances within biomolecular pathways. Cell–cell statistical distances are calculated from pathway mRNA fold changes between two cells. Within an elaborate case study of circulating tumor cells derived from prostate cancer patients, we develop analytic methods of aggregated distances to identify five differentially expressed pathways associated to therapeutic resistance. Our aggregation analyses perform comparably with Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and better than differentially expressed genes followed by gene set enrichment. However, these methods were not designed to inform on differential pathway expression for a single cell. As such, our framework culminates with the novel aggregation method, cell-centric statistics (CCS). CCS quantifies the effect size and significance of differentially expressed pathways for a single cell of interest. Improved rose plots of differentially expressed pathways in each cell highlight the utility of CCS for therapeutic decision-making. Availability and implementation: http://www.lussierlab.org/publications/CCS/ Contact: yves@email.arizona.edu or piegorsch@math.arizona.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Bioinformatics. Volume 32:Number 12(2016)
- Journal:
- Bioinformatics
- Issue:
- Volume 32:Number 12(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 12 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0032-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- i80
- Page End:
- i89
- Publication Date:
- 2016-06-11
- Subjects:
- Bioinformatics -- Periodicals
Genomics -- Data processing -- Periodicals
Computational biology -- Periodicals
572.80285 - Journal URLs:
- http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw248 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1367-4803
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2072.348000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12388.xml