The Clinical Utility of Point-of-Care Tests for Influenza in Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (4th October 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Clinical Utility of Point-of-Care Tests for Influenza in Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (4th October 2018)
- Main Title:
- The Clinical Utility of Point-of-Care Tests for Influenza in Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Lee, Joseph Jonathan
Verbakel, Jan Y
Goyder, Clare Rosemary
Ananthakumar, Thanusha
Tan, Pui San
Turner, Phillip James
Hayward, Gail
Van den Bruel, Ann - Abstract:
- Abstract : We reviewed the evidence for the impact of point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza. Testing reduced further investigation with chest radiography and full blood counts, and increased antiviral prescribing, but had no impact on antibiotic use, returning for care, or admissions. Abstract: Background: Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for influenza are diagnostically superior to clinical diagnosis, but their impact on patient outcomes is unclear. Methods: A systematic review of influenza POCTs versus usual care in ambulatory care settings. Studies were identified by searching six databases and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Estimates of risk ratios (RR), standardised mean differences, 95% confidence intervals and I2 were obtained by random effects meta-analyses. We explored heterogeneity with sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. Results: 12, 928 citations were screened. Seven randomized studies (n = 4, 324) and six non-randomized studies (n = 4, 774) were included. Most evidence came from paediatric emergency departments. Risk of bias was moderate in randomized studies and higher in non-randomized studies. In randomized trials, POCTs had no effect on admissions (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.42, I2 = 34%), returning for care (RR 1.00 95% CI = 0.77–1.29, I2 = 7%), or antibiotic prescribing (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82–1.15, I2 = 70%), but increased prescribing of antivirals (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.95–3.60; I2 = 0%). Further testing was reduced for full blood countsAbstract : We reviewed the evidence for the impact of point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza. Testing reduced further investigation with chest radiography and full blood counts, and increased antiviral prescribing, but had no impact on antibiotic use, returning for care, or admissions. Abstract: Background: Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for influenza are diagnostically superior to clinical diagnosis, but their impact on patient outcomes is unclear. Methods: A systematic review of influenza POCTs versus usual care in ambulatory care settings. Studies were identified by searching six databases and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Estimates of risk ratios (RR), standardised mean differences, 95% confidence intervals and I2 were obtained by random effects meta-analyses. We explored heterogeneity with sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. Results: 12, 928 citations were screened. Seven randomized studies (n = 4, 324) and six non-randomized studies (n = 4, 774) were included. Most evidence came from paediatric emergency departments. Risk of bias was moderate in randomized studies and higher in non-randomized studies. In randomized trials, POCTs had no effect on admissions (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.42, I2 = 34%), returning for care (RR 1.00 95% CI = 0.77–1.29, I2 = 7%), or antibiotic prescribing (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82–1.15, I2 = 70%), but increased prescribing of antivirals (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.95–3.60; I2 = 0%). Further testing was reduced for full blood counts (FBC) (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.92 I2 = 0%), blood cultures (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99; I2 = 0%) and chest radiography (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.96; I2 = 32%), but not urinalysis (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78–w1.07; I2 = 20%). Time in the emergency department was not changed. Fewer non-randomized studies reported these outcomes, with some findings reversed or attenuated (fewer antibiotic prescriptions and less urinalysis in tested patients). Conclusions: Point-of-care testing for influenza influences prescribing and testing decisions, particularly for children in emergency departments. Observational evidence shows challenges for real-world implementation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 69:Number 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Number 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0069-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 24
- Page End:
- 33
- Publication Date:
- 2018-10-04
- Subjects:
- influenza -- diagnostics
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciy837 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12380.xml