Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Loosening of Revision Hip Prosthesis: A Comparison Between MARS and non-MARS Images. Issue 3 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guziński, Maciej; Kubicki, Konrad; Waszczuk, Łukasz; Morawska-Kochman, Monika; Kochman, Andrzej; Sąsiadek, Marek
• Is Part Of: Journal of computer assisted tomography. Volume 43:Issue 3(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: multidetector computed tomography -- radiography -- dual-energy scanned projection -- artifacts -- arthroplasty -- replacement, hip -- radiographic image enhancement; Tomography -- Periodicals; Tomography -- Periodicals; Tomography; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000850
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-8715

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess potential endoprosthesis loosening in patients after revision total hip arthroplasty, based on monochromatic dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images obtained with and without metal artifact reduction software (MARS) and comparison with the clinical examination and hip function. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent DECT examinations. Two monochromatic data sets were generated: with MARS (75-keV MARS) and without MARS (140-keV non-MARS) and evaluated for signs of loosening, using a dedicated radiological score. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate patients' hip function. Results: The mean radiological score for loosening in the non-MARS group was 16.2, in the MARS group 17.0 and was significantly higher ( P < 0.001). Radiological loosening evaluation in non-MARS images correlated with the HHS score (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.03), whereas there was no correlation between MARS images and HHS (ρ = 0.15, P = 0.47). New MARS-related artifacts, which hinder implant-bone interface evaluation, were found in 75-keV MARS images ("pseudo-loosening" in 33 of 34 prostheses, "ground-glass blurring" in 20 of 32). Conclusions: High-energy monochromatic DECT images are superior to low-energy DECT MARS images in assessment of the potential loosening and correlate better with the clinical examination outcomes. For revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation, 2 data sets should be assessed inseparably because of extra artifacts in MARS images.