Age determination using feldspar: Evaluating fading-correction model performance. (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Age determination using feldspar: Evaluating fading-correction model performance. (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Age determination using feldspar: Evaluating fading-correction model performance
- Authors:
- King, Georgina E.
Burow, Christoph
Roberts, Helen M.
Pearce, Nicholas J.G. - Abstract:
- Abstract: The recent introduction of post-IR IRSL measurement protocols has prompted a resurgence in luminescence applications using feldspar, some of which are affected by anomalous fading related signal loss. Many fading-corrected feldspar ages are reported in the literature, however few of those ages have been corrected using the model of Huntley (2006) [Huntley, D.J., 2006. An explanation of the power-law decay of luminescence. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 18(4), 1359–1365] . Here we present a new R function that calculates fading-corrected ages using the model of Huntley (2006), implemented with either a single-saturating exponential (1EXP) or general-order kinetic (GOK) fit. We evaluate the performance of the model through (i) contrasting measured and modelled field saturation values for a suite of 41 published saturated samples, and (ii) through using the model to fading-correct feldspar ages of samples with independent age control. Our results indicate that when implemented with 1EXP this model has an accuracy of 10% for predicting sample saturation, but that independent ages may be overestimated when the model is used to fading-correct samples across a range of timescales. In contrast, providing that the dose response curve has been characterised beyond 600 Gy, implementing the Huntley (2006) model with a GOK fit yields accurate age estimations. Modelled age overestimation for 1EXP is associated with dose response curve deviation from a single-saturatingAbstract: The recent introduction of post-IR IRSL measurement protocols has prompted a resurgence in luminescence applications using feldspar, some of which are affected by anomalous fading related signal loss. Many fading-corrected feldspar ages are reported in the literature, however few of those ages have been corrected using the model of Huntley (2006) [Huntley, D.J., 2006. An explanation of the power-law decay of luminescence. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 18(4), 1359–1365] . Here we present a new R function that calculates fading-corrected ages using the model of Huntley (2006), implemented with either a single-saturating exponential (1EXP) or general-order kinetic (GOK) fit. We evaluate the performance of the model through (i) contrasting measured and modelled field saturation values for a suite of 41 published saturated samples, and (ii) through using the model to fading-correct feldspar ages of samples with independent age control. Our results indicate that when implemented with 1EXP this model has an accuracy of 10% for predicting sample saturation, but that independent ages may be overestimated when the model is used to fading-correct samples across a range of timescales. In contrast, providing that the dose response curve has been characterised beyond 600 Gy, implementing the Huntley (2006) model with a GOK fit yields accurate age estimations. Modelled age overestimation for 1EXP is associated with dose response curve deviation from a single-saturating exponential. Finally we contrast the laboratory measured light levels of a suite of 50 saturated samples with their corresponding fading rates. We show that these saturated samples may yield D e values below 2D 0, and thus that 2D 0 is not an effective screening criterion for sample saturation where no anomalous fading correction is made. Highlights: Fading correction of feldspar luminescence is explored using known age samples. Dose response deviation from a single saturating exponential causes age overestimation. A general order kinetic fit results in accurate age determination. 2D0 cannot be used to evaluate feldspar saturation, unless fading is corrected for. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiation measurements. Volume 119(2018:Dec.)
- Journal:
- Radiation measurements
- Issue:
- Volume 119(2018:Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 119 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 119
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0119-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- 58
- Page End:
- 73
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Nuclear emulsions -- Periodicals
Particle tracks (Nuclear physics) -- Periodicals
Thermoluminescence -- Periodicals
Cosmic rays -- Periodicals
Radiation -- Measurement -- Periodicals
Radiometry -- Periodicals
Radiation Monitoring -- Periodicals
Émulsions nucléaires -- Périodiques
Particules (Physique nucléaire) -- Traces -- Périodiques
Thermoluminescence -- Périodiques
Rayonnement cosmique -- Périodiques
Radiométrie -- Périodiques
539.77 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13504487 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiation-measurements/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.07.013 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1350-4487
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7227.973000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12381.xml