Study of alternatives and experimental validation for predictions of hole-edge fatigue crack growth in 42CrMo4 steel. (1st December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Escalero, Mikel; Blasón, Sergio; Zabala, Haritz; Torca, Ireneo; Urresti, Iker; Muniz-Calvente, Miguel; Fernández-Canteli, Alfonso
• Is Part Of: Engineering structures. Volume 176(2018)
• Page Start: 621
• Page End: 631
• Publication Date: 2018-12-01
• Subjects: Fatigue crack growth -- Fitness-for-service -- Bearing ring -- BS 7910:2013 -- Alternative predictions -- Experimental validation; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; Pression du vent -- Périodiques; Earthquake engineering; Structural engineering; Wind-pressure; Periodicals; 624.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-0296

Abstract

Highlights: Crack growth is predicted following alternatives of distinct complexity and accuracy. Local stresses should be computed analytically in the uncracked body. Failure assessment diagram is indispensable for detecting final failure accurately. Remeshing technique yields similar predictions comparing to analytical algorithms. Abstract: The objective of this work is to establish pertinent criteria allowing an optimal alternative to be chosen for calculating the inputs needed to make Run/Repair/Replace decisions and to program inspection plans for cracked wind turbine bearing rings. With this aim, the growth of a hole-edge through-crack was predicted analytically, simulated and measured in a 42CrMo4 steel plate subjected to mode-I cyclic loading. Different alternative procedures according to BS 7910:2013 fitness-for-service code were implemented. Unexpectedly, the numerical calculation of the local stresses in the uncracked body did not improve the estimations of the critical crack length and the number of cycles to failure performed following purely analytical alternatives. That alternative underestimated the critical crack length by 50%. Among the alternatives studied, the one based on numerically calibrated stress intensity factors and crack growth coefficients characterized at the corresponding stress ratios proved to be the most suitable one. Following that alternative, the fatigue life was found to be overestimated by 3.96% in the best scenario whereas the critical crack length was underestimated with an error less than 3%, determined using the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) as a failure criterion.