Infections and associated costs following cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantations: a nationwide cohort study. Issue 12 (17th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clémenty, Nicolas; Carion, Phuong Lien; Léotoing, Lucie de; Lamarsalle, Ludovic; Wilquin-Bequet, Fanny; Brown, Benedict; Verhees, Koen J P; Fernandes, Jérôme; Deharo, Jean-Claude
• Is Part Of: Europace. Volume 20:Issue 12(2018)
• Page Start: 1974
• Page End: 1980
• Publication Date: 2018-04-17
• Subjects: Cardiac implantable electronic device -- Infection -- Outcomes -- Health care costs -- Pacemaker -- Defibrillator; Arrhythmia -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Catheter ablation -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux387
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1099-5129

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: This study assessed the contemporary occurrence of cardiac device infections (CDIs) following implantation in French hospitals and estimated associated costs. Methods and Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the French National Hospital Database (PMSI). Patients with a record of de novo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation or replacement interventions in France in 2012 were identified and followed until the end of 2015. Cardiac device infections (CDIs) were identified based on coding using the French classification for procedures [ Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux (CCAM)] and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Associated costs were estimated based on direct costs from the perspective of the French social security system. In total 78 267 CIED patients (72% de novo implants) were identified (15% defibrillators; 84% pacemakers). The 36-month infection rate associated with de novo defibrillator-only implants, as well as for cardiac resynchronisation therapy - defibrillators (CRT-Ds) was 1.6%. The CDI risk was 2.9% and 3.9% for replacement ICDs and CRT-Ds. Infection rates were lower for de novo single-chamber pacemaker (SCP)/dual-chamber pacemaker (DCP) (0.5%) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy - pacemaker (CRT-P) implants (1.0%), while for replacement procedures the risk increased to 1.4% (SCP/DCP) and 1.3% (CRT-P). Mean infection-related costs over 24 months were €20 623 and €23 234 for CDIs associated with replacement and de novo procedures, and overall costs were not significantly different between pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Conclusion: Cardiac device infections in France are associated with substantial costs, when considering inpatient hospitalizations. Strategies to minimize the rate of CIED infection should be a priority for health care providers and payers.