Spinal ischaemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery sacrifice: is there a critical stent graft length?. (24th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kari, Fabian A; Saravi, Babak; Krause, Sonja; Puttfarcken, Luisa; Wittmann, Karin; Förster, Katharina; Rylski, Bartosz; Maier, Sven; Göbel, Ulrich; Siepe, Matthias; Czerny, Martin; Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
• Is Part Of: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. Volume 53:Number 2(2018)
• Page Start: 385
• Page End: 391
• Publication Date: 2017-08-24
• Subjects: Thoracic aortic aneurysm -- Thoracic aortic stent graft -- Spinal ischaemia -- Collateral blood flow; Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Chest -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.54
• DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx285
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1010-7940

Abstract

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is used for treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies, but the covered stent graft can induce spinal ischaemia depending on the length used. The left subclavian artery contributes to spinal cord collateralization and is frequently occluded by the stent graft. Our objective was to investigate the impact of covered stent graft length on the risk of spinal ischaemia in the setting of left subclavian artery sacrifice. METHODS: Twenty-six pigs (German country race, mean body weight 36 ± 4 kg) underwent simulated descending aortic TEVAR via left lateral thoracotomy, with left subclavian artery and thoracic segmental artery occlusion in normothermia. Animals were assigned to treatment groups according to simulated stent graft length: TEVAR to T8 ( n = 4), TEVAR to T9 ( n = 4), TEVAR to T10 ( n = 4), TEVAR to T11 ( n = 7) and TEVAR to T12 ( n = 1) and a sham group ( n = 6). End points included spinal cord perfusion pressure, cerebrospinal fluid pressure and spinal cord blood flow using fluorescent microspheres. RESULTS: There were no group differences in spinal cord perfusion pressure drop or in spinal cord perfusion pressure regeneration potential at 3 h after the procedure: from a baseline average of 75 mmHg (95% confidence interval 71–83 mmHg) to 73 mmHg (67–75 mmHg) at 3 h in Group T10 versus from a baseline average of 67 mmHg (95% CI 50–81 mmHg) to 65 mmHg (95% confidence interval 48–81 mmHg) in Group T8. There were no differences in the spinal cord blood flow courses over time in the different groups nor was there any difference in cerebrospinal fluid pressure levels and cerebrospinal fluid pressure dynamics between groups. However, we did observe local blood flow distribution to the spinal cord that was inhomogeneous depending on the distance between the simulated stent graft end and the first thoracic anterior radiculomedullary artery. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of spinal ischaemia after serial segmental artery occlusion does not depend on the distal extent of the aortic repair alone. Future attempts to allow patient risk stratification for spinal ischaemia need to focus on anterior radiculomedullary artery anatomy together with the extent of planned aortic repair.