323 Health-Care Utilization and Bundled Payment Reimbursement for Patients Undergoing Anterior and Posterior Procedures for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy. Issue Volume 65:Issue CN(2018)Supplement 1 (16th August 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 323 Health-Care Utilization and Bundled Payment Reimbursement for Patients Undergoing Anterior and Posterior Procedures for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy. Issue Volume 65:Issue CN(2018)Supplement 1 (16th August 2018)
- Main Title:
- 323 Health-Care Utilization and Bundled Payment Reimbursement for Patients Undergoing Anterior and Posterior Procedures for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy
- Authors:
- Alhourani, Ahmad
Sharma, Mayur
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Nuno, Miriam
Drazin, Doniel
Boakye, Maxwell - Abstract:
- Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are the surgical procedures performed to treat patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR) METHODS: Data were extracted from MarketScan database (2000-2012), using ICD-9 and CPT-4 codes. Bundled payment was calculated as the cumulated payments from the index hospitalization admission to 90 d postsurgery discharge. We also analyzed the index hospitalization (physician, hospital as and total) and the postdischarge payments (hospital readmission, outpatient services, medications, and total). Groups were matched on the propensity score and number of levels operated on (single or multiple). RESULTS: A cohort of 3852 patients was identified from the database. A matched cohort of 2714 patients underwent multilevel surgery, while 1138 patients underwent single level surgery. Median 90-d bundle payment was significantly higher for ACDF compared to that for PCF for single-level (median $25 699 vs $15 263) and multilevel surgery (median $29 377 vs $16 295) P < .0001. The total index hospitalization payments (single level: median $22 870 vs $12 466, multilevel: median $26 730 vs $13 391), physician payment single level: median $4306 vs $1647, multilevel: median $5142 vs $2043), and hospital payments single level: median $12 438 vs $6764, multilevel: median $14 976 vs $7157), were higher for ACDF compared to PCF, P < .0001. There was no significant differenceAbstract: INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are the surgical procedures performed to treat patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR) METHODS: Data were extracted from MarketScan database (2000-2012), using ICD-9 and CPT-4 codes. Bundled payment was calculated as the cumulated payments from the index hospitalization admission to 90 d postsurgery discharge. We also analyzed the index hospitalization (physician, hospital as and total) and the postdischarge payments (hospital readmission, outpatient services, medications, and total). Groups were matched on the propensity score and number of levels operated on (single or multiple). RESULTS: A cohort of 3852 patients was identified from the database. A matched cohort of 2714 patients underwent multilevel surgery, while 1138 patients underwent single level surgery. Median 90-d bundle payment was significantly higher for ACDF compared to that for PCF for single-level (median $25 699 vs $15 263) and multilevel surgery (median $29 377 vs $16 295) P < .0001. The total index hospitalization payments (single level: median $22 870 vs $12 466, multilevel: median $26 730 vs $13 391), physician payment single level: median $4306 vs $1647, multilevel: median $5142 vs $2043), and hospital payments single level: median $12 438 vs $6764, multilevel: median $14 976 vs $7157), were higher for ACDF compared to PCF, P < .0001. There was no significant difference between the 2 procedures in overall 90-d postdischarge payments for both single and multilevel surgery (single level: median $1611 vs $1387, multilevel: median $1805 vs $1749, P -value >.25). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of DCR using ACDF generates higher health care resource utilization at the index hospitalization compared to PCF without any difference noted in 90-d postdischarge costs. PCF are an economically preferred option for bundled payment strategies. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neurosurgery. Volume 65:Issue CN(2018)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Neurosurgery
- Issue:
- Volume 65:Issue CN(2018)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 65, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 65
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0065-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 130
- Page End:
- 130
- Publication Date:
- 2018-08-16
- Subjects:
- Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.48005 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery ↗
http://www.neurosurgery-online.com ↗
https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuros/nyy303.323 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0148-396X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.582000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12358.xml