Optimal design of nose and tail of an autonomous underwater vehicle hull to reduce drag force using numerical simulation. (February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saghafi, Mohammad; Lavimi, Roham
• Is Part Of: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Volume 234:Number 1(2020:Feb.)
• Page Start: 76
• Page End: 88
• Publication Date: 2020-02
• Subjects: Autonomous underwater vehicle hull -- optimal nose -- optimal tail -- computational fluid dynamics -- drag estimation; Marine engineering -- Periodicals; 623.805
• DOI: 10.1177/1475090219863191
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-0902

Abstract

In this research, the flow around the autonomous underwater vehicles with symmetrical bodies is numerically investigated. Increasing the drag force in autonomous underwater vehicles increases the energy consumption and decreases the duration of underwater exploration and operations. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to decrease drag force with the change in geometry to reduce energy consumption. In this study, the decreasing or increasing trends of the drag force of axisymmetric bare hulls have been studied by making alterations in the curve equations and creating the optimal geometric shapes in terms of hydrodynamics for the noses and tails of autonomous underwater vehicles. The incompressible, three-dimensional, and steady Navier–Stokes equations have been used to simulate the flow. Also, k-ε Realizable with enhanced wall treatment was used for turbulence modeling. Validation results were acceptable with respect to the 3.6% and 1.4% difference with numerical and experimental results. The results showed that all the autonomous underwater vehicle hulls designed in this study, at an attack angle of 0°, had a lower drag force than the autonomous underwater vehicle hull used for validation except geometry no. 1. In addition, nose no. 3 has been selected as the best nose according to the lowest value of stagnation pressure, and also tail no. 3 has been chosen as the best tail due to the production of the lowest vortex. Therefore, geometry no. 5 has been designed using nose and tail no. 3. The comparison made here showed that the maximum drag reduction in geometry no. 5 was equal to 26%, and therefore, it has been selected as the best bare hull in terms of hydrodynamics.