Comparison of methods for control allocation in multiple arm studies using response adaptive randomization. (February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Viele, Kert; Broglio, Kristine; McGlothlin, Anna; Saville, Benjamin R
• Is Part Of: Clinical trials. Volume 17:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 52
• Page End: 60
• Publication Date: 2020-02
• Subjects: Multiple arm clinical trial -- response adaptive randomization -- control allocation; 615.5072405
• DOI: 10.1177/1740774519877836
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1740-7745

Abstract

Background/Aims: Response adaptive randomization has many polarizing properties in two-arm settings comparing control to a single treatment. The generalization of these features to the multiple arm setting has been less explored, and existing comparisons in the literature reach disparate conclusions. We investigate several generalizations of two-arm response adaptive randomization methods relating to control allocation in multiple arm trials, exploring how critiques of response adaptive randomization generalize to the multiple arm setting. Methods: We perform a simulation study to investigate multiple control allocation schemes within response adaptive randomization, comparing the designs on metrics such as power, arm selection, mean square error, and the treatment of patients within the trial. Results: The results indicate that the generalization of two-arm response adaptive randomization concerns is variable and depends on the form of control allocation employed. The concerns are amplified when control allocation may be reduced over the course of the trial but are mitigated in the methods considered when control allocation is maintained or increased during the trial. In our chosen example, we find minimal advantage to increasing, as opposed to maintaining, control allocation; however, this result reflects an extremely limited exploration of methods for increasing control allocation. Conclusion: Selection of control allocation in multiple arm response adaptive randomization has a large effect on the performance of the design. Some disparate comparisons of response adaptive randomization to alternative paradigms may be partially explained by these results. In future comparisons, control allocation for multiple arm response adaptive randomization should be chosen to keep in mind the appropriate match between control allocation in response adaptive randomization and the metric or metrics of interest.