Clinical utility of pre-endoscopy risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. (2nd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tham, Jennifer; Stanley, Adrian
• Is Part Of: Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. Volume 13:Number 12(2019)
• Page Start: 1161
• Page End: 1167
• Publication Date: 2019-12-02
• Subjects: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding -- acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage -- risk assessment -- Glasgow Blatchford score -- AIMS65 -- pre-endoscopic Rockall score; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.3
• DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1698292
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1747-4124

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction : Acute upper-gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a common medical emergency, with an incidence of 103–172 per 100, 000 in the United Kingdom (UK) and mortality of 2% to 10%. Early and accurate prediction of the severity of an AUGIB episode may help guide management, including in or outpatient management, level of care required, and timing of endoscopy. This article aims to address the clinical utility of the various pre-endoscopic risk assessment tools used in AUGIB. Areas covered : The authors undertook a literature review of the current evidence on the pre-endoscopic risk assessment scores. Additional the authors discuss the recently published novel risk assessment scores. Expert opinion : The evidence shows that GBS is the most clinically useful risk assessment score in correctly identifying very low-risk patients suitable for outpatient management. At present, research is ongoing to assess machine learning in the assessment of patients presenting with AUGIB. More research is needed but it shows promise for the future.