Initial Experience Using a Telerobotic Ultrasound System for Adult Abdominal Sonography. Issue 3 (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Adams, Scott J.; Burbridge, Brent E.; Badea, Andreea; Langford, Leanne; Vergara, Vincent; Bryce, Rhonda; Bustamante, Luis; Mendez, Ivar M.; Babyn, Paul S.
• Is Part Of: Canadian Association of Radiologists journal. Volume 68:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 308
• Page End: 314
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: Remote presence -- Robotics -- Teleradiology -- Telerobotic -- Telesonography -- Ultrasound; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Canada -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2016.08.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0846-5371

Abstract

Purpose: The study sought to assess the feasibility of performing adult abdominal examinations using a telerobotic ultrasound system in which radiologists or sonographers can control fine movements of a transducer and all ultrasound settings from a remote location. Methods: Eighteen patients prospectively underwent a conventional sonography examination (using EPIQ 5 [Philips] or LOGIQ E9 [GE Healthcare]) followed by a telerobotic sonography examination (using the MELODY System [AdEchoTech] and SonixTablet [BK Ultrasound]) according to a standardized abdominal imaging protocol. For telerobotic examinations, patients were scanned remotely by a sonographer 2.75 km away. Conventional examinations were read independently from telerobotic examinations. Image quality and acceptability to patients and sonographers was assessed. Results: Ninety-two percent of organs visualized on conventional examinations were sufficiently visualized on telerobotic examinations. Five pathological findings were identified on both telerobotic and conventional examinations, 3 findings were identified using only conventional sonography, and 2 findings were identified using only telerobotic sonography. A paired sample t test showed no significant difference between the 2 modalities in measurements of the liver, spleen, and diameter of the proximal aorta; however, telerobotic assessments overestimated distal aorta and common bile duct diameters and underestimated kidney lengths ( P values < .05). All patients responded that they would be willing to have another telerobotic examination. Conclusions: A telerobotic ultrasound system is feasible for performing abdominal ultrasound examinations at a distant location with minimal training and setup requirements and a moderate learning curve. Telerobotic sonography (robotic telesonography) may open up the possibility of remote ultrasound clinics for communities that lack skilled sonographers and radiologists, thereby improving access to care.