348 An Integrated Solution to Predict the Stimulation Parameters After STN DBS for PD. Issue Volume 65:Issue CN(2018)Supplement 1 (16th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Krishna, Vibhor; Sammartino, Francesco; Rabbani, Qinwan; Changizi, Barbara K; Agrawal, Punit; Deogaonkar, Milind; Knopp, Michael V; Young, Nicole; Rezai, Ali R
• Is Part Of: Neurosurgery. Volume 65:Issue CN(2018)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 139
• Page End: 139
• Publication Date: 2018-08-16
• Subjects: Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48005
• DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy303.348
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-396X

Abstract

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) titration is experience dependent and time consuming. It is expected to be more challenging with the wider use of directional DBS leads. Connectivity-based methods for stimulation titration are required. We hypothesized that stimulation parameters can be estimated based on the cortical connections of the DBS electrodes. METHODS: Twenty-four Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS were included. All patients had preoperative 3T diffusion imaging (60 directions) and 1-yr follow-up after DBS. We recorded parameters associated with stimulation-induced acute clinical effects (ACE) during DBS programming. We classified them into improvement (rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor) and side effects (paresthesia, motor contractions, visual disturbances). Using probabilistic tractography, we identified the cortical voxels uniquely associated with each ACE category. A prediction algorithm, based on support vector machines (SVM) with repeated cross-validation, was trained on the unique features of cortical connectivity. This algorithm was then used to estimate the optimal contact and stimulation amplitude combination for each DBS contact in both hemispheres. A blinded comparison with actual stimulation parameters was done using sensitivity analysis. We also tested the classifier on another independent cohort of 14 PD patients with STN DBS. RESULTS: Clusters in premotor and SMA (area 6) were significantly associated with therapeutic stimulation. At 1 yr, 42 of the 47 stimulation electrodes were accurately estimated as "efficacious" and the therapeutic window calculated to be = 3 V in 31(66%) and between 2 and 2.9 V in 11(24%), respectively. The SVM algorithm had excellent sensitivity (area under curve = 0.8506, 95% confidence interval 0.7026-0.9987). Its sensitivity was maintained in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The optimal stimulation settings after DBS can be estimated from the pattern of cortical connections of each electrode. Prospective validation in a larger cohort may help test the prediction accuracy of this approach.