Anisotropic fluid modeling of ionospheric upflow: Effects of low‐altitude anisotropy and thermospheric winds. Issue 1 (3rd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burleigh, M.; Zettergren, M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 122:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 808
• Page End: 827
• Publication Date: 2017-01-03
• Subjects: anisotropic fluid modeling -- ionospheric upflow -- effects of low‐altitude anisotropy -- thermospheric winds; Magnetospheric physics -- Periodicals; Space environment -- Periodicals; Cosmic physics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Atmospheres -- Periodicals; Heliosphere (Astrophysics) -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 523.01
• DOI: 10.1002/2016JA023329
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9380

Abstract

Abstract: A new anisotropic fluid model is developed to describe ionospheric upflow responses to magnetospheric forcing by electric fields and broadband ELF waves at altitudes of 90–2500 km. This model is based on a bi‐Maxwellian ion distribution and solves time‐dependent, nonlinear equations of conservation of mass, momentum, parallel energy, and perpendicular energy for six ion species important to E, F, and topside ionospheric regions. It includes chemical and collisional interactions with the neutral atmosphere, photoionization, and electron impact ionization. This model is used to examine differences between isotropic and anisotropic descriptions of ionospheric upflow driven by DC electric fields, possible effects of low‐altitude (<500 km) wave heating, and impacts of neutral winds on ion upflow. Results indicate that isotropic models may overestimate field‐aligned ion velocity responses by as much as ∼48%. Simulations also show significant ionospheric responses at low altitudes to wave heating for very large power spectral densities, but ion temperature anisotropies below the F region peak are dominated by frictional heating from DC electric fields. Neutral winds are shown to play an important role regulating ion upflow. Thermospheric winds can enhance or suppress upward fluxes driven by DC and BBELF fields by 10–20% for the cases examined. The time history of the neutral winds also affects the amount of ionization transported to higher altitudes by DC electric fields. Key Points: A new anisotropic fluid model is developed and describes ionospheric responses to energy sources causing anisotropy DC electric fields dominate temperature anisotropies at lower altitudes, while wave heating dominates at higher altitudes High‐latitude thermospheric winds can aid or hinder upflow depending on the wind direction