Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale. (1st October 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale. (1st October 2018)
- Main Title:
- Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale
- Authors:
- Hadders‐Algra, Mijna
Tacke, Uta
Pietz, Joachim
Rupp, André
Philippi, Heike - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aim: To assess reliability and predictive validity of the neurological scale of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA), a recently developed assessment for infants aged 6 weeks to 12 months. Method: To assess reliability, three assessors independently rated video‐recorded neurological assessments of 24 infants twice. Item difficulty and discrimination were determined. To evaluate predictive validity, 181 infants (median gestational age 30wks [range 22–41wks]; 92 males, 89 females) attending a non‐academic outpatient clinic were assessed with SINDA's neurological scale (28 dichotomized items). Atypical neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months or older corrected age implied a Bayley Mental Developmental Index or Psychomotor Developmental Index lower than 70 or a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP). Predictive values were calculated from SINDA (2–12mo corrected age, median 3mo) and typical versus atypical outcome. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients of intrarater and interrater agreement of the neurological score varied between 0.923 and 0.965. Item difficulty and discrimination were satisfactory. At 24 months or older, 56 children (31%) had an atypical outcome (29 had CP). Atypical neurological scores (below 25th centile, ≤21) predicted atypical outcome and CP with sensitivities of 89% and 100%, and specificities of 94% and 81% respectively. Interpretation: SINDA's neurological scale is reliable and in a non‐academic outpatient settingAbstract : Aim: To assess reliability and predictive validity of the neurological scale of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA), a recently developed assessment for infants aged 6 weeks to 12 months. Method: To assess reliability, three assessors independently rated video‐recorded neurological assessments of 24 infants twice. Item difficulty and discrimination were determined. To evaluate predictive validity, 181 infants (median gestational age 30wks [range 22–41wks]; 92 males, 89 females) attending a non‐academic outpatient clinic were assessed with SINDA's neurological scale (28 dichotomized items). Atypical neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months or older corrected age implied a Bayley Mental Developmental Index or Psychomotor Developmental Index lower than 70 or a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP). Predictive values were calculated from SINDA (2–12mo corrected age, median 3mo) and typical versus atypical outcome. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients of intrarater and interrater agreement of the neurological score varied between 0.923 and 0.965. Item difficulty and discrimination were satisfactory. At 24 months or older, 56 children (31%) had an atypical outcome (29 had CP). Atypical neurological scores (below 25th centile, ≤21) predicted atypical outcome and CP with sensitivities of 89% and 100%, and specificities of 94% and 81% respectively. Interpretation: SINDA's neurological scale is reliable and in a non‐academic outpatient setting has a satisfactory predictive validity for atypical developmental outcome, including CP, at 24 months or older. What this paper adds: The Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment's neurological scale has a good to excellent reliability. The scale has promising predictive validity for cerebral palsy. The scale has promising predictive validity for other types of atypical developmental outcome. What this paper adds: The Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment's neurological scale has a good to excellent reliability. The scale has promising predictive validity for cerebral palsy. The scale has promising predictive validity for other types of atypical developmental outcome. This article's abstract has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese. Follow the links from the abstract to view the translations. This article is commented on by Jary on page 623 of this issue. Video Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpawGtkZl5I&feature=youtu.be Resumen: Confiabilidad y validez predictiva de la escala neurológica de la Evaluación del neurodesarrollo infantil estandarizada: Objetivo: Evaluar la confiabilidad y la validez predictiva de la escala neurológica de la Evaluación del Neurodesarrollo Infantil Estandarizada (SINDA), una evaluación desarrollada recientemente para bebés de 6 semanas a 12 meses. Método: Para evaluar la confiabilidad, tres evaluadores evaluaron dos veces, de forma independiente, las evaluaciones neurológicas grabadas en videos de 24 recién nacidos. Se determinaron la dificultad del ítem y la discriminación. Para evaluar la validez predictiva, se evaluaron 181 neonatos (mediana de edad gestacional de 30 semanas [rango 22‐41 semanas], 92 varones, 89 mujeres) que asisten a una clínica ambulatoria no académica con la escala neurológica de SINDA (28 ítems dicotomizados). El resultado del desarrollo neurológico atípico a los 24 meses o mayor edad corregida implicaba un índice de desarrollo mental o índice de desarrollo psicomotor Bayley inferior a 70 o un diagnóstico de parálisis cerebral (PC). Los valores predictivos se calcularon a partir de SINDA (edad corregida 2‐12mo, mediana 3meses) y resultado típico versus a atípico. Resultados: Los coeficientes de correlación intraclase de la concordancia intra e inter codificador del puntaje neurológico variaron entre 0.923 y 0.965. La dificultad del item y la discriminación fueron satisfactorias. A los 24 meses o más, 56 niños (31%) tuvieron un resultado atípico (29 tuvieron PC). Las puntuaciones neurológicas atípicas (por debajo del percentil 25, ≤21) predijeron un resultado atípico y PC con sensibilidades del 89% y del 100%, y especificidades del 94% y del 81%, respectivamente. Interpretación: La escala neurológica de SINDA es confiable y en un entorno ambulatorio no académico tiene una validez predictiva satisfactoria para la detección del desarrollo atípico, incluido la PC, a los 24 meses o más. Resumo: Confiabilidade e validade preditiva da escala neurológica de Avaliação Padronizada Neurodesenvolvimental Infantil: Objetivo: Avaliar a confiabilidade e validade preditiva da escala neurológica Avaliação Padronizada Neurodesenvolvimental Infantil (SINDA), uma avaliação desenvolvida recentemente para lactentes de 6 semanas a 12 meses de idade. Método: Para avaliar a confiabilidade, por duas vezes três avaliadores pontuaram independentemente avaliações neurológicas de 24 lactentes registradas em vídeo. Para avaliar a validade preditiva, 181 lactentes (idade gestacional mediana de 30 semanas[variação de 22 a 41 semanas]); 92 do sexo masculino; 89 do sexo feminino) que frequentavam uma clínica não acadêmica foram avaliados com a escala neurológica da SINDA (28 itens dicotomizados). O neurodesenvolvimento atípico na idade de 24 meses de idade corrigida ou mais tarde foi determinado por índice desenvolvimental mental da Bayley ou Item desenvolvimental psicomotor menor do que 70 ou diagnóstico de paralisia cerebral (PC). Os valores preditivos foram calculados para o SINDA (2‐12 meses de idade corrigida, mediana de 3 m) e resultado típico versus atípico. Resultados: Os coeficientes de correlação intraclasse de concordância intra ou inter‐examinadores do escore neurológico variaram de 0, 923 a 0, 965. A dificuldade e discriminação do item foram satisfatórias. Aos 24 meses de idade ou mais, 56 crianças (31%) tiveram resultado atípico (29 tinham PC). Os escores neurológicos atípicos (abaixo do percentil 25, ≤21) foram preditivos de resultado atípico e PC com sensibilidades de 89% e 100%, e especificidades de 94% e 81%, respectivamente. Interpretação: A escala neurológica SINDA é confiável e em um ambiente não acadêmico tem validade preditiva satisfatória para resultado atípico do desenvolvimento, incluindo PC, aos 24 meses de idade ou mais. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Developmental medicine & child neurology. Volume 61:Number 6(2019)
- Journal:
- Developmental medicine & child neurology
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Number 6(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 6 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0061-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 654
- Page End:
- 660
- Publication Date:
- 2018-10-01
- Subjects:
- Child development -- Periodicals
Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8749 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/dmcn.14045 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0012-1622
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3579.055000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12349.xml