Brachial and Radial Systolic Blood Pressure Are Not the Same: Evidence to Support the Popeye Phenomenon. Issue 5 (May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Brachial and Radial Systolic Blood Pressure Are Not the Same: Evidence to Support the Popeye Phenomenon. Issue 5 (May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Brachial and Radial Systolic Blood Pressure Are Not the Same
- Authors:
- Armstrong, Matthew K.
Schultz, Martin G.
Picone, Dean S.
Black, J. Andrew
Dwyer, Nathan
Roberts-Thomson, Philip
Sharman, James E. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Radial intra-arterial blood pressure (BP) is sometimes used as the reference standard for validation of brachial cuff BP devices. Moreover, there is an emerging wearables market seeking to measure BP at the wrist. However, radial systolic BP may differ when compared with brachial; yet some authors have labeled these differences as a fictional Popeye phenomenon. Indeed, differences between brachial and radial systolic BP have never been accurately quantified, and this was the aim of this study. Intra-arterial BP was measured consecutively at the brachial and radial artery in 180 participants undergoing coronary angiography (aged 61±10 years; 69% men). On average, radial systolic BP was 5.5 mm Hg higher than brachial systolic BP. Only 43% of participants had radial systolic BP within ±5 mm Hg of brachial. Additionally, 46%, 19%, and 13% of participants had radial systolic BP >5, between 5 and 10, and between 10 and 15 mm Hg higher than brachial respectively. A further 14% of participants had radial systolic BP >15 mm Hg higher than brachial, representing the so-called Popeye phenomenon. Finally, 11% of participants had radial systolic BP >5 mm Hg lower than brachial. In conclusion, radial systolic BP is not representative of brachial systolic BP, with most participants having a radial systolic BP >5 mm Hg higher than brachial and many with differences >15 mm Hg. Therefore, validation testing of BP devices utilizing intra-arterial BP as the reference standard shouldAbstract : Radial intra-arterial blood pressure (BP) is sometimes used as the reference standard for validation of brachial cuff BP devices. Moreover, there is an emerging wearables market seeking to measure BP at the wrist. However, radial systolic BP may differ when compared with brachial; yet some authors have labeled these differences as a fictional Popeye phenomenon. Indeed, differences between brachial and radial systolic BP have never been accurately quantified, and this was the aim of this study. Intra-arterial BP was measured consecutively at the brachial and radial artery in 180 participants undergoing coronary angiography (aged 61±10 years; 69% men). On average, radial systolic BP was 5.5 mm Hg higher than brachial systolic BP. Only 43% of participants had radial systolic BP within ±5 mm Hg of brachial. Additionally, 46%, 19%, and 13% of participants had radial systolic BP >5, between 5 and 10, and between 10 and 15 mm Hg higher than brachial respectively. A further 14% of participants had radial systolic BP >15 mm Hg higher than brachial, representing the so-called Popeye phenomenon. Finally, 11% of participants had radial systolic BP >5 mm Hg lower than brachial. In conclusion, radial systolic BP is not representative of brachial systolic BP, with most participants having a radial systolic BP >5 mm Hg higher than brachial and many with differences >15 mm Hg. Therefore, validation testing of BP devices utilizing intra-arterial BP as the reference standard should use intra-arterial BP measured at the same site as the brachial cuff or wearable device. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Hypertension. Volume 73:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Hypertension
- Issue:
- Volume 73:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 73, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 73
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0073-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05
- Subjects:
- hemodynamics -- hypertension -- technology
Hypertension -- Periodicals
Hypertension -- Treatment -- Periodicals
616.132005 - Journal URLs:
- http://hyper.ahajournals.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12674 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0194-911X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4352.629000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12327.xml