Early outcomes and radiographic alignment of the Infinity total ankle replacement with a minimum of two year follow-up data. Issue 6 (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: King, Andrew; Bali, Navjit; Kassam, Al-Amin; Hughes, Adrian; Talbot, Nicholas; Sharpe, Ian
• Is Part Of: Foot and ankle surgery. Volume 25:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 826
• Page End: 833
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: Ankle replacement -- Ankle arthroplasty -- Alignment -- Patient reported outcomes; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- surgery -- Periodicals; Foot -- surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery; Foot -- Surgery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.58
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.11.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1268-7731

Abstract

Highlights: Two year outcomes of the Infinity total ankle replacement. Prospective follow up including patient reported outcome measures. Comparative cohort study with radiographic analysis of alignment of Infinity prosthesis compared to the Zenith Total Ankle R prosthesis. Significantly improved alignment of prostheses with use of the Infinity fluoroscopically guided alignment jigs. Positive outcomes at two years for the Infinity group with few complications and no revisions to date. Abstract: Background: The Infinity total ankle replacement (Wright Medical Technology, Memphis, TN) is a low profile, fluoroscopically navigated, fixed-bearing device. We hypothesised that the fluoroscopic navigation would allow more accurate alignment of the prosthesis than conventional techniques. We present our minimum two year follow up data of Infinity ankle replacements. Methods: All total ankle replacements (TARs) performed at our institution were prospectively followed-up with EQ5-D and MOx-FQ scores as well as intra-operative radiation exposure and radiographic alignment data. Post-operative radiographs were used to measure the alignment of the prostheses. We identified 20 implants with minimum of two year follow up which were compared to a control group of 20 Zenith TAR's (Corin, Cirencester, UK). Results: Intra-operative fluoroscopic navigation has allowed excellent alignment of all prostheses. Median deviations from 90° alignment to the anatomical axis of the tibia were 1.5° and 1.2° in the anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral planes respectively, compared to 2.8° and 3.1° in the Zenith group. This difference reached significance (p = < 0.05) using the Mann–Whitney U test. At 2 years, MOx-FQ scores had fallen from pre-operative mean of 63.9 ∓ 17.1 to 15 ∓ 12.7. EQ-5D VAS scores had improved from 71.3 ∓ 17.3 to 81.4 ∓ 9.7 points. Radiation exposure had a mean screening time of 82 ∓ 29.4 s and a decrease in exposure per patient was observed over time. No patients have undergone, or are awaiting, revision surgery. Complications include one intraoperative medial malleolar tip avulsion fracture, one medial malleolar stress fracture, and one patient who developed CRPS. Conclusions: We present evidence that this system achieves better anatomical alignment of the components when compared to techniques without fluoroscopic navigation. The implant survival and complication profile at a minimum of two years is satisfactory.